Back

Clinical Performance of BD Veritor™ Assay Across SARS-CoV-2 Variants

Eckert, K.; Gutierrez, S.; Knight, B.; Cooper, L.

2023-04-17 infectious diseases
10.1101/2023.04.11.23288130 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDifferent rates of morbidity, mortality, transmission, and immune escape are associated with various strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. With the emergence of new strains during seasonal outbreaks, ensuring that antigen-based immunoassays can detect SARS-CoV-2 infections across identified circulating viral variants is a crucial component of infection control efforts. ObjectiveTo validate the performance of the BD Veritor System for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Assay (BD Veritor assay) to detect SARS-CoV-2 across variants of concern (VOC) and variants of interest (VOI). MethodsUsing the Illumina NextSeq 2000 Sequencer, viral sequencing was performed on prospectively collected, then frozen, SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive nasal swabs stored in universal transport media (UTM). Specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals were included in the study. Using the information obtained from the sequencing analysis, the performance of the BD Veritor System assay was evaluated against the highly sensitive molecular RT-PCR Quidel Lyra SARS-CoV-2 assay for each variant. ResultsThe resulting PPA was 97.4% (95% CI: 86.8, 99.5) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 across all variants identified by Next Generation Sequencing (i.e., WHO-labeled variants Alpha, Delta, Gamma, Iota, Lambda, as well as two other non-labeled variants), with a 100% PPA for five of the six variant labels identified. ConclusionThe results demonstrate the robust performance of the BD Veritor assay in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in clinical nasal specimens in selected variants. As new variants emerge, additional studies will be beneficial to ensure the sustained performance of SARS-CoV-2 assays.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Virology
62 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.2%
2
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.4%
3
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
4
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
6
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.2%
8
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
9
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.6%
10
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
11
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
12
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
17
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
18
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
20
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
22
Influenza and Other Respiratory Viruses
44 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
23
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
24
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
25
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%