Clinical Performance of BD Veritor™ Assay Across SARS-CoV-2 Variants
Eckert, K.; Gutierrez, S.; Knight, B.; Cooper, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundDifferent rates of morbidity, mortality, transmission, and immune escape are associated with various strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. With the emergence of new strains during seasonal outbreaks, ensuring that antigen-based immunoassays can detect SARS-CoV-2 infections across identified circulating viral variants is a crucial component of infection control efforts. ObjectiveTo validate the performance of the BD Veritor System for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Assay (BD Veritor assay) to detect SARS-CoV-2 across variants of concern (VOC) and variants of interest (VOI). MethodsUsing the Illumina NextSeq 2000 Sequencer, viral sequencing was performed on prospectively collected, then frozen, SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR positive nasal swabs stored in universal transport media (UTM). Specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals were included in the study. Using the information obtained from the sequencing analysis, the performance of the BD Veritor System assay was evaluated against the highly sensitive molecular RT-PCR Quidel Lyra SARS-CoV-2 assay for each variant. ResultsThe resulting PPA was 97.4% (95% CI: 86.8, 99.5) for detection of SARS-CoV-2 across all variants identified by Next Generation Sequencing (i.e., WHO-labeled variants Alpha, Delta, Gamma, Iota, Lambda, as well as two other non-labeled variants), with a 100% PPA for five of the six variant labels identified. ConclusionThe results demonstrate the robust performance of the BD Veritor assay in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in clinical nasal specimens in selected variants. As new variants emerge, additional studies will be beneficial to ensure the sustained performance of SARS-CoV-2 assays.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A multicenter study to assess the performance of the point-of-care RT-PCR Cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B nucleic acid test for use on the Cobas Liat system in comparison with centralized assays across healthcare facilities in the United States 96%
- Estimating the false positive rate of highly automated SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification testing 95%
- Performance and Implementation Evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW Rapid Antigen Test in a High-throughput Drive-through Community Testing Site in Massachusetts 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Antigen-based testing but not real-time PCR correlates with SARS-CoV-2 virus culture 96%
- Performance of Repeat BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 Antigen Testing in a Community Setting, Wisconsin, November-December 2020 96%
- The New Normal: Delayed Peak SARS-CoV-2 Viral Loads Relative to Symptom Onset and Implications for COVID-19 Testing Programs 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of a Commercial Culture-free Neutralization Antibody Detection Kit for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome-Related Coronavirus-2 and Comparison with an Anti-RBD ELISA Assay 94%
- Impact of Nasopharyngeal Specimen Quality on SARS-CoV-2 Test Sensitivity 93%
- Evaluation of six commercial SARS-CoV-2 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent assays for clinical testing and serosurveillance 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative study of four SARS-CoV-2 Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (NAAT) platforms demonstrates that ID NOW performance is impaired substantially by patient and specimen type. 94%
- Diagnostic performance of multiplex lateral flow tests in ambulatory patients with acute respiratory illness 94%
- Practical strategies for SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR testing in resource-constrained settings 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance characteristics of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay at a public plaza testing site in San Francisco 95%
- Longitudinal assessment of diagnostic test performance over the course of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection 94%
- SARS-CoV-2 Serosurveys: How antigen, isotype and threshold choices affect the outcome 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.