Back

Improving online health search via multi-dimensional information quality models based on deep learning

Zhang, B.; Naderi, N.; Mishra, R.; Teodoro, D.

2023-04-17 health informatics
10.1101/2023.04.11.22281038 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundWidespread misinformation in Web resources can lead to serious implications for individuals seeking health advice. Despite that, information retrieval models are often focused only on the query-document relevance dimension to rank results. ObjectiveWe investigate a multi-dimensional information quality retrieval model based on deep learning to enhance the effectiveness of online healthcare information search results. MethodsIn this study, we simulated online health information search scenarios with a topic set of 32 different health-related inquiries and a corpus containing one billion Web documents from the April 2019 snapshot of Common Crawl. Using state-of-the-art pre-trained language models, we assessed the quality of the retrieved documents according to their usefulness, supportiveness, and credibility dimensions for a given search query on 6,030 human-annotated query-document pairs. We evaluated this approach using transfer learning and more specific domain adaptation techniques. ResultsIn the transfer learning setting, the usefulness model provided the largest distinction between help- and harm-compatible documents with a difference of +5.6%, leading to a majority of helpful documents in the top-10 retrieved. The supportiveness model achieved the best harm compatibility (+2.4%), while the combination of usefulness, supportiveness, and credibility models achieved the largest distinction between help- and harm-compatibility on helpful topics (+16.9%). In the domain adaptation setting, the linear combination of different models showed robust performance with help-harm compatibility above +4.4% for all dimensions and going as high as +6.8%. ConclusionsThese results suggest that integrating automatic ranking models created for specific information quality dimensions can increase the effectiveness of health-related information retrieval. Thus, our approach could be used to enhance searches made by individuals seeking online health information.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.