Improving online health search via multi-dimensional information quality models based on deep learning
Zhang, B.; Naderi, N.; Mishra, R.; Teodoro, D.
Show abstract
BackgroundWidespread misinformation in Web resources can lead to serious implications for individuals seeking health advice. Despite that, information retrieval models are often focused only on the query-document relevance dimension to rank results. ObjectiveWe investigate a multi-dimensional information quality retrieval model based on deep learning to enhance the effectiveness of online healthcare information search results. MethodsIn this study, we simulated online health information search scenarios with a topic set of 32 different health-related inquiries and a corpus containing one billion Web documents from the April 2019 snapshot of Common Crawl. Using state-of-the-art pre-trained language models, we assessed the quality of the retrieved documents according to their usefulness, supportiveness, and credibility dimensions for a given search query on 6,030 human-annotated query-document pairs. We evaluated this approach using transfer learning and more specific domain adaptation techniques. ResultsIn the transfer learning setting, the usefulness model provided the largest distinction between help- and harm-compatible documents with a difference of +5.6%, leading to a majority of helpful documents in the top-10 retrieved. The supportiveness model achieved the best harm compatibility (+2.4%), while the combination of usefulness, supportiveness, and credibility models achieved the largest distinction between help- and harm-compatibility on helpful topics (+16.9%). In the domain adaptation setting, the linear combination of different models showed robust performance with help-harm compatibility above +4.4% for all dimensions and going as high as +6.8%. ConclusionsThese results suggest that integrating automatic ranking models created for specific information quality dimensions can increase the effectiveness of health-related information retrieval. Thus, our approach could be used to enhance searches made by individuals seeking online health information.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the performance of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 on the Medical Final Examination 92%
- Bridging Auditory Perception and Natural Language Processing with Semantically informed Deep Neural Networks 92%
- OxCOVID19 Database: a multimodal data repository for better understanding the global impact of COVID-19 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enriching Representation Learning Using 53 Million Patient Notes through Human Phenotype Ontology Embedding 93%
- Comparing neural language models for medical concept representation and patient trajectory prediction 92%
- Building Large-Scale Registries from Unstructured Clinical Notes using a Low-Resource Natural Language Processing Pipeline 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.