Exploring the adoption of digital pathology in clinical settings - Insights from a cross-continent study
Pinto, D. G.; Bychkov, A.; Tsuyama, N.; Fukuoka, J.; Eloy, C.
Show abstract
The last seventy years have been characterized by rapid advancements in computer technology, and the healthcare system has not been immune to this trend. However, anatomic pathology has remained largely an analog discipline. In recent years, this has been changing with the growing adoption of digital pathology, partly driven by the potential of computer-aided diagnosis. As part of an international collaboration, we conducted a comprehensive survey to gain a deeper understanding of the status of digital pathology implementation in Europe and Asia. A total of 127 anatomic pathology laboratories participated in the survey, including 75 from Europe and 52 from Asia, with 72 laboratories having established digital pathology workflow and 55 without digital pathology. Laboratories using digital pathology were thoroughly questioned about their implementation strategies and institutional experiences, including details on equipment, storage, integration with laboratory information system, computer-aided diagnosis, and the costs of going digital. The impact of the digital pathology workflow was also evaluated, focusing on turnaround time, specimen traceability, quality control, and overall satisfaction. Laboratories without access to digital pathology were asked to provide insights into their perceptions of the technology, expectations, barriers to adoption, and potential facilitators. Our findings indicate that while digital pathology is still the future for many, it is already the present for some. This decade may be a time when anatomic pathology finally embraces the digital revolution on a large scale. HIGHLIGHTSO_LILarger labs adopt digital pathology more C_LIO_LIFull digital transition is still rare nowadays C_LIO_LIMany initial concerns have not materialized after implementation C_LIO_LIMost non-digital laboratories plan to go digital soon C_LI
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Critical Appraisal of Predatory Journals in Pathology 89%
- Molecular point-of-care testing for influenza A/B and respiratory syncytial virus: comparison of workflow parameters for the ID Now and cobas Liat systems 88%
- Increasing both specificity and sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests by using an adaptive orthogonal testing approach 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial Intelligence for Advance Requesting of Immunohistochemistry in Diagnostically Uncertain Prostate Biopsies 94%
- Clinical-Grade Validation of an Autofluorescence Virtual Staining System with Human Experts and a Deep Learning System for Prostate Cancer 91%
- Tissue contamination challenges the credibility of machine learning models in real world digital pathology 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Creating virtual H&E images using samples imaged on a commercial CODEX platform 94%
- Development of an Interactive Web Dashboard to Facilitate the Reexamination of Pathology Reports for Instances of Underbilling of CPT Codes 93%
- Independent assessment of a deep learning system for lymph node metastasis detection on the Augmented Reality Microscope 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The role of veterinary diagnostic laboratories during COVID-19 response in the United States 92%
- Weakly supervised learning for multi-organ adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images 92%
- Early user experience and lessons learned using ultra-portable digital X-ray with computer-aided detection (DXR-CAD) products: A qualitative study from the perspective of healthcare providers 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Machine Learning Ensemble Based on Radiomics to Predict BI-RADS Category and Reduce the Biopsy Rate of Ultrasound-Detected Suspicious Breast Masses 90%
- Auto-detection of motion artifacts on CT pulmonary angiograms with a physician-trained AI algorithm 90%
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.