Sequence Vs. Structure: Delving Deep Into Data Driven Protein Function Prediction
Tian, X.; Wang, Z.; Yang, K. K.; Su, J.; Du, H.; Zheng, Q.; Guo, G.; Yang, M.; Yang, F.; Yuan, F.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWPredicting protein function is a longstanding challenge that has significant scientific implications. The success of amino acid sequence-based learning methods depends on the relationship between sequence, structure, and function. However, recent advances in AlphaFold have led to highly accurate protein structure data becoming more readily available, prompting a fundamental question: given sufficient experimental and predicted structures, should we use structure-based learning methods instead of sequence-based learning methods for predicting protein function, given the intuition that a proteins structure has a closer relationship to its function than its amino acid sequence? To answer this question, we explore several key factors that affect function prediction accuracy. Firstly, we learn protein representations using state-of-the-art graph neural networks (GNNs) and compare graph construction(GC) methods at the residue and atomic levels. Secondly, we investigate whether protein structures generated by AlphaFold are as effective as experimental structures for function prediction when protein graphs are used as input. Finally, we compare the accuracy of sequence-only, structure-only, and sequence-structure fusion-based learning methods for predicting protein function. Additionally, we make several observations, provide useful tips, and share code and datasets to encourage further research and enhance reproducibility.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Combining protein sequences and structures with transformers and equivariant graph neural networks to predict protein function 98%
- A Gated Graph Transformer for Protein ComplexStructure Quality Assessment and its Performancein CASP15 98%
- Sequence alignment using machine learning for accurate template-based protein structure prediction 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- SPDesign: protein sequence designer based on structural sequence profile using ultrafast shape recognition 98%
- AlphaFold2-aware protein-DNA binding site prediction using graph transformer 97%
- EGRET: Edge Aggregated Graph Attention Networks and Transfer Learning Improve Protein-Protein Interaction Site Prediction 97%
Similar papers in this journal
- ProALIGN: Directly learning alignments for protein structure prediction via exploiting context-specific alignment motifs 96%
- Combined topological data analysis and geometric deep learning reveal niches by the quantification of protein binding pockets 95%
- Critiquing Protein Family Classification Models Using Sufficient Input Subsets 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- DISTEMA: distance map-based estimation of single protein model accuracy with attentive 2D convolutional neural network 95%
- Struct2Graph: A graph attention network for structure based predictions of protein-protein interactions 95%
- Multi-Head Attention-based U-Nets for Predicting Protein Domain Boundaries Using 1D Sequence Features and 2D Distance Maps 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.