In silico predictions of the hepatic metabolic clearance in humans for 10 drugs with highly variable in vitro pharmacokinetics
Fagerholm, U.
Show abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWChallenges/problems for in vitro methodologies for prediction of human clinical pharmacokinetics include inter- and intra-laboratory variability, and common occurance of high limits of quantification, low recovery, low parameter validity and low reproducibility. In this study, 10 drugs with substantial differences in human hepatocyte intrinsic metabolic clearance (CLint) and fraction unbound in plasma (fu) between laboratories were selected. The average and maximum ratios between highest and lowest reported predicted in vivo hepatic metabolic clearance (CLH) for the drugs were 529- and 2436-fold, respectively. The in vivo CLH was predicted using in vitro CLint and fu data from the various highly sources and using our in silico methodology. The main aim was to compare the predictive accuracies for the in vitro and in silico methodologies. Prediction errors for in vitro methodology ranged from 1.1-to 578-fold, with an average of 150-fold for lowest predicted estimates and 16-fold for highest predicted estimates. The in vitro based predictions produced 36-to 38-fold higher average and maximum prediction errors than the in silico methodology, respectively. Mean and maximum in silico prediction errors were 4.2- and 15-fold, respectively, which is consistent with earlier results. In contrast to the in vitro methodology the in silico models did not predict high hepatic extraction ratio for drugs with low CLH. Overall, the in silico method clearly outperformed in vitro data for prediction of CLH in man for 10 drugs with large interlaboratory variability.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel oral niclosamide formulation compared with marketed niclosamide chewing tablets in healthy volunteers: a three-part randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 95%
- DigiLoCS: A Leap Forward in Predictive Organ-on-Chip Simulations 94%
- Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Inhaled Dry Powder Hydroxychloroquine in Healthy Volunteers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimal dosing of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime for critically ill paediatric patients. Can we use microsampling? 94%
- Pharmacokinetic modelling to estimate intracellular favipiravir ribofuranosyl-5’-triphosphate exposure to support posology for SARS-CoV-2 92%
- Point-of-care semiquantitative test for adherence to tenofovir alafenamide or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved bioavailability of montelukast through a novel oral mucoadhesive film in humans and mice 94%
- Interactions of anti-COVID-19 drug candidates with multispecific ABC and OATP drug transporters 91%
- Amorphous solid dispersions and the confounding effect of nanoparticles in in vitro dissolution and in vivo testing: Niclosamide as a case of study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensitivity of Estimated Tacrolimus Population Pharmacokinetic Profile to Inaccurate Assumptions about Dose Timing and Absorption: An Investigation in Real-World and Simulated Data 94%
- External validation of the predictive performance of population pharmacokinetic models for phenobarbital in pediatric patients 94%
- Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Dexmedetomidine in Children using Real-World-Data Obtained from Electronic Health Records and Remnant Clinic Samples 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.