Age-Modulated Immuno-Metabolic Proteome Profiles of Deceased Donor Kidneys Predict 12-Month Posttransplant Outcome
Charles, P. D.; Fawaz, S.; Vaughan, R. H.; Davis, S.; Joshi, P.; Vendrell, I.; Tam, K. H.; Fischer, R.; Kessler, B. M.; Sharples, E. J.; Santos, A.; Ploeg, R. J.; Kaisar, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundOrgan availability limits kidney transplantation, the best treatment for end-stage kidney disease. Globally, deceased donor acceptance criteria have been relaxed to include older donors, which comes with a higher risk of inferior posttransplant outcomes. Donor age, although negatively impacts transplant outcomes, lacks granularity in predicting graft dysfunction. Better donor kidney assessment and characterization of the biological mechanisms underlying age-associated donor organ damage and transplant outcomes is key to improving donor kidney utilisation and transplant longevity. Methods185 deceased pretransplant biopsies (from brain and circulatory death donors aged 18-78 years) were obtained from the Quality in Organ Donation (QUOD) biobank and proteomic profiles were acquired by mass spectrometry. Machine learning exploration using prediction rule ensembles guided LASSO regression modeling of kidney proteomes that identified protein signatures and biological mechanisms associated with 12-m posttransplant outcome. Data modeling was validated on held-out data and contextualised against published spatially resolved kidney injury related transcriptomes. ResultsOur analysis highlighted that outcomes were best modeled using combination of donor age and protein abundance signatures, revealing 539 proteins with these characteristics. Modeled age:protein interactions demonstrated stronger associations with transplant outcomes than age and protein alone and revealed mechanisms of kidney injury including metabolic changes and innate immune responses correlated with poor outcome. Comparison to single-cell transcriptome data suggests protein-outcome associations to specific cell types. ConclusionsMolecular signatures resulted from integration of donor age and proteomic profiles in deceased donor kidney biopsies offer the potential to develop improved pretransplant organ assessment and aid decisions on perfusion interventions.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mismatches in gene deletions and kidney-related proteins are novel histocompatibility factors in kidney transplantation 94%
- Urine single cell RNA-sequencing in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis reveals inflammatory signatures in immune cells and podocytes 94%
- Urine Test Predicts Kidney Injury and Death in COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deceased donor kidney degradomics indicates cytoskeletal proteolytic alterations impacting post-transplant function 96%
- Machine learning-supported interpretation of kidney graft elementary lesions in combination with clinical data 93%
- Improving diagnostic performance of kidney allograft rejection with a model combining relative fraction and absolute copies of donor-derived cell-free DNA - results from five independent cohorts 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Harnessing Expressed Single Nucleotide Variation and Single Cell RNA Sequencing to Define Immune Cell Chimerism in the Rejecting Kidney Transplant 94%
- Proteomics Reveals Extracellular Matrix Injury in the Glomeruli and Tubulointerstitium of Kidney Allografts with Early Antibody-Mediated Rejection 94%
- RNA Alternative Splicing and Polyadenylation and Regulation of the Glomerular Filtration Barrier 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning identifies pathological abnormalities predictive of graft loss in kidney transplant biopsies 95%
- Molecular Programs of Glomerular Hyperfiltration in Early Diabetic Kidney Disease 93%
- Urinary single-cell sequencing captures intrarenal injury and repair processes in human acute kidney injury 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.