Back

Income-based differences in health care utilization in relation to mortality: Trends in the Swedish population between 2004-2017

Flodin, P.; Allebeck, P.; Gubi, E.; Burström, B.; Agardh, E.

2023-03-31 epidemiology
10.1101/2023.03.31.23287996 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundDespite universal health care, socioeconomic differences in health care utilization (HCU) persist in modern welfare states. The aim of this study is to assess income-based differences in utilization of primary- and specialized care in relation to mortality for the Swedish general population (>15 years old) between 2004 and 2017. Methods and FindingsUsing a repeated cross-sectional register-based study design, data on utilization of i) primary-ii) specialized outpatient- and iii) inpatient care, as well as iv) cause of death, were linked to family income and sociodemographic control variables. HCU and mortality for all-disease as well as for the five disease groups causing most deaths were compared for the lowest (Q1) and highest (Q5) income quintile using logistic regression. We also analysed income-related differences in the number of health care encounters [≤]5 years prior to death. In 2017, for all diseases combined, Q1 utilized marginally more primary- and specialized outpatient care than Q5 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] =1.07, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.08; OR 1.04, 95% CI: 1.04, 1.05, respectively), and considerably more inpatient care (OR=1.44, 95% CI: 1.43, 1.45). The largest relative inequality was observed for mortality (OR 1.78, 95% CI: 1.74, 1.82). This pattern was broadly reproduced for each of the five diseases. Time trends in HCU inequality varied by level of care. Each year, Q1 (vs. Q5) used more inpatient care and suffered increasing mortality rates. However, usage of primary- and specialized outpatient care increased more among Q5 than in Q1. Finally, Q1 and Q5 had similar number of encounters in primary- and inpatient care [≤]5 years prior to death, but Q1 had significantly fewer outpatient encounters. ConclusionsIncome-related differences in the utilization of primary and specialized outpatient care were considerably smaller than for mortality, and this discrepancy widened with time. Facilitating motivated use of primary- and outpatient care among low-income groups could help mitigate the growing health inequalities.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
European Journal of Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
International Journal of Epidemiology
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
9.0%
4
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
5
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.5%
7
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
American Journal of Epidemiology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.7%
9
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
10
The Lancet Public Health
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 51%
2.1%
12
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
13
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
14
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.6%
16
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
17
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
18
European Journal of Epidemiology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
19
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
21
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
23
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
24
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
25
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
26
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
28
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
30
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%