Prescribing differences among older adults with differing health cover and socioeconomic status: a cohort study
Prendergast, C.; Flood, M.; Murry, L. T.; Clyne, B.; Fahey, T.; Moriarty, F.
Show abstract
IntroductionAs health reforms move Ireland from a mixed public-private system toward universal healthcare, it is important to understand variations in prescribing practice for patients with differing health cover and socioeconomic status. This study aims to determine how prescribing patterns for patients aged [≥]65 years in primary care in Ireland differ between patients with public and private health cover. MethodsThis was an observational study using anonymised data collected as part of a larger study from 44 general practices in Ireland (2011-2018). Data were extracted from electronic records relating to demographics and prescribing for patients aged [≥]65 years. The cohort was divided between those with public health cover (via the General Medical Services (GMS) scheme) and those without. Standardised rates of prescribing were calculated for pre-specified drug classes. We also analysed the number of medications, polypharmacy, and trends over time between groups, using multilevel linear regression adjusting for age and sex. ResultsOverall, 42,456 individuals were included (56% female). Most were covered by the GMS scheme (62%, n=26,490). The rate of prescribing in all medication classes was higher for GMS patients compared to non-GMS patients, with the greatest difference in benzodiazepine anxiolytics. The mean number of unique medications prescribed to GMS patients was 10.9 (SD 5.9), and 8.1 (SD 5.8) for non-GMS patients. The number of unique medications prescribed to both GMS and non-GMS cohorts increased over time. The increase was steeper in the GMS group where the mean number of medications prescribed increased by 0.67 medications/year. The rate of increase was 0.13 (95%CI 0.13, 0.14) medications/year lower for non-GMS patients, a statistically significant difference. ConclusionOur study found a significantly larger number of medicines were prescribed to patients with public health cover, compared to those without. Increasing medication burden and polypharmacy among older adults may be accelerated for those of lower socioeconomic status. These findings may inform planning for moves towards universal health care, and this would provide an opportunity to evaluate the effect of expanding entitlement on prescribing and medicines use.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing 96%
- Antipsychotic management in general practice: serial cross-sectional study (2011-2020) 94%
- Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medication Clusters at Hospital Discharge and Risk of Adverse Drug Events at 30-days Post-Discharge: A Population-based Cohort Study of Older Adults 95%
- Trends in analgesia prescribing in primary care in Ireland and England between 2014 and 2022 - a repeated cross-sectional study 95%
- A comprehensive assessment of statin discontinuation among patients who concurrently initiate statins and CYP3A4-inhibitor drugs; a multistate transition model 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- How many medications do doctors in primary care use? An observational study of the DU90% indicator in primary care in England. 95%
- Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study 94%
- Risks of use and non-use of antibiotics in primary care. Qualitative study of prescribers' views 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Changes in dispensing of medicines proposed for re-purposing in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia 95%
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 94%
- Effect of common maintenance drugs on the risk and severity of COVID-19 in elderly patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patient characteristics associated with clinically coded long COVID: an OpenSAFELY study using electronic health records 91%
- A mixed-methods evaluation of patients’ views on primary care multi-disciplinary teams in Scotland 91%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.