Back

Prescribing differences among older adults with differing health cover and socioeconomic status: a cohort study

Prendergast, C.; Flood, M.; Murry, L. T.; Clyne, B.; Fahey, T.; Moriarty, F.

2023-04-03 primary care research
10.1101/2023.03.30.23287967
Show abstract

IntroductionAs health reforms move Ireland from a mixed public-private system toward universal healthcare, it is important to understand variations in prescribing practice for patients with differing health cover and socioeconomic status. This study aims to determine how prescribing patterns for patients aged [≥]65 years in primary care in Ireland differ between patients with public and private health cover. MethodsThis was an observational study using anonymised data collected as part of a larger study from 44 general practices in Ireland (2011-2018). Data were extracted from electronic records relating to demographics and prescribing for patients aged [≥]65 years. The cohort was divided between those with public health cover (via the General Medical Services (GMS) scheme) and those without. Standardised rates of prescribing were calculated for pre-specified drug classes. We also analysed the number of medications, polypharmacy, and trends over time between groups, using multilevel linear regression adjusting for age and sex. ResultsOverall, 42,456 individuals were included (56% female). Most were covered by the GMS scheme (62%, n=26,490). The rate of prescribing in all medication classes was higher for GMS patients compared to non-GMS patients, with the greatest difference in benzodiazepine anxiolytics. The mean number of unique medications prescribed to GMS patients was 10.9 (SD 5.9), and 8.1 (SD 5.8) for non-GMS patients. The number of unique medications prescribed to both GMS and non-GMS cohorts increased over time. The increase was steeper in the GMS group where the mean number of medications prescribed increased by 0.67 medications/year. The rate of increase was 0.13 (95%CI 0.13, 0.14) medications/year lower for non-GMS patients, a statistically significant difference. ConclusionOur study found a significantly larger number of medicines were prescribed to patients with public health cover, compared to those without. Increasing medication burden and polypharmacy among older adults may be accelerated for those of lower socioeconomic status. These findings may inform planning for moves towards universal health care, and this would provide an opportunity to evaluate the effect of expanding entitlement on prescribing and medicines use.

Matching journals

1
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 3%
5.6× avg
2
British Journal of General Practice
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 22 published papers
#1
194× avg
3
BJGP Open
Royal College of General Practitioners · based on 12 published papers
#1
140× avg
4
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 47%
11.0%
5
BMC Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 155 published papers
Top 1%
8.9× avg
6
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 19 published papers
Top 1.0%
17× avg
7
Journal of Medical Internet Research
JMIR Publications Inc. · based on 81 published papers
Top 9%
2.5× avg
8
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 4%
7.1× avg
9
The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
Elsevier BV · based on 32 published papers
Top 1%
16× avg
10
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers Media SA · based on 135 published papers
Top 21%
1.3%
11
PLOS Medicine
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 95 published papers
Top 11%
2.4× avg
12
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Wiley · based on 21 published papers
Top 2%
6.8× avg
13
Journal of Sleep Research
Wiley · based on 14 published papers
Top 1.0%
11× avg
14
ERJ Open Research
European Respiratory Society (ERS) · based on 36 published papers
Top 3%
3.9× avg
15
The Lancet
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 1.0%
12× avg
16
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ · based on 32 published papers
Top 2%
4.5× avg
17
Wellcome Open Research
F1000 Research Ltd · based on 34 published papers
Top 4%
4.3× avg
18
Preventive Medicine
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 0.5%
14× avg
19
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 12 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
20
BMC Geriatrics
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
8.9× avg