Back

A high-throughput multiplex array for antigen-specific serology with automated analysis.

Rosenberg, A. F.; Killian, J. T.; Green, T. J.; Akther, J.; Hossain, E.; Qiu, S.; Randall, T. D.; Lund, F. E.; King, R. G.

2023-04-01 immunology
10.1101/2023.03.29.534777 bioRxiv
Show abstract

High-throughput customizable CBA automated script-based analysisThe utility of high-throughput systems to evaluate antigen-specific antibody (Ab) has been highlighted by the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Pathogen-specific Ab levels are often used to assess protection following vaccination and, in the case of novel pathogens, an indication of prior exposure. Several platforms exist to visualize antigen-specific Ab, however most are not quantitative and are difficult to scale for population level studies. Additionally, the sensitivity across platforms differs making direct comparisons between studies difficult. Cytometric bead arrays (CBA) are an attractive platform for antigen-specific Ab measurements as they can be used to assess Ab reactivity against several antigens and of several isotypes to be performed simultaneously. Additionally, CBAs exhibit high sensitivity and can be designed to provide quantitative measurements. Using commercially available particles, a biotin-Streptavidin bead loading strategy, and the inclusion of indirect standards, we describe a flexible system that can be modified to include a variety of antigens. Here we describe two arrays, focused on antigens derived from either {beta}-coronaviruses or influenza virus. To support the high-throughput capacity of this system, we developed a suit of automated software tools, the CBA Toolbox, to process raw data into antigen-reactive IgM, IgA, and IgG concentrations. We describe quality control requirements, assay performance, and normalizations to accurately quantitate antigen-specific Ig.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Immunological Methods
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.3%
2
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.2%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
The Journal of Immunology
146 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.8%
5
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
7
mAbs
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
8
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 6%
2.8%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
10
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
11
European Journal of Immunology
57 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
12
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
13
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
14
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
15
Antibody Therapeutics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
16
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
17
Immunology
29 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.8%
18
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
19
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
20
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
21
Analytical Biochemistry
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
22
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
23
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
24
Pathogens
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%