Kidney Failure Prediction: Multicenter External Validation of the KFRE Model in Patients with CKD Stages 3-4 in Peru
Bravo-Zuniga, J. I.; Chavez-Gomez, R.; Soto-Becerra, P.
Show abstract
BackgroundTo externally validate the 4-variable Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) in the Peruvian population for predicting kidney failure at 2 and 5 years. MethodsWe included patients from 17 primary care centers from the Healths Social Security of Peru. Patients older than 18 years, diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 3a-3b-4 and 3b-4, between January 2013 and December 2017. Patients were followed until they developed kidney failure, died, were lost, or ended the study (December 31, 2019), whichever came first. Performance of the KFRE model was assessed based on discrimination and calibration measures considering the competing risk of death. ResultsWe included 7519 patients in stages 3a-4 and 2,798 patients in stages 3b-4. KFRE discrimination at 2 and 5 years was high, with Time-Dependent Area Under the Curve (AUC-td) and C-index > 0.8 for all populations. Regarding calibration in-the-large, the Observed-to-Expected (O/E) ratio and the calibration intercept indicated that KFRE underestimates the overall risk at two years and overestimates it at 5-years in all populations. ConclusionsThe 4-variable KFRE models have good discrimination but poor calibration in the Peruvian population. The model underestimates the risk of kidney failure in the short term and overestimates it in the long term. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTThe Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) is a widely used prediction model for kidney failure risk assessment in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, its performance in Latin American populations remains unclear, particularly in primary care settings. This study externally validated the KFRE in Peruvian CKD patients, demonstrating high discrimination but revealing miscalibration that could lead to adverse patient outcomes resulting from over- or under-estimation of risk. These results underscore the need for model updating and further research to optimize the KFREs use in clinical practice in Latin America, provide valuable insights for applying the KFRE in Latin American settings, and highlight the importance of continuous evaluation and refinement of prediction models in diverse populations.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Chronic Kidney Disease in Ecuador: An Epidemiological and Health System Analysis of an Emerging Public Health Crisis 95%
- Evaluating the kidney disease progression using a comprehensive patient profiling algorithm: A hybrid clustering approach 95%
- Progression of chronic kidney disease among black patients attending a tertiary hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- External validation of six clinical models for prediction of unknown chronic kidney disease in a German population 96%
- Comparison of the prevalence and associated factors of chronic kidney disease diagnosed by serum creatinine or cystatin C among young people living with HIV in Uganda 95%
- Ramadan and Kidney disease (RaK) risk assessment tool. Potential Risk Calculator for Evaluating the Risk of Ramadan Fasting In Chronic Kidney Disease patients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of low eGFR prevalence and prediction for mortality using 2009 and 2021 CKD-EPI equations in Mexican adults 95%
- Circulating Plasma Biomarkers in Biopsy-Confirmed Kidney Disease: Results from the Boston Kidney Biopsy Cohort 93%
- Impaired incretin homeostasis in non-diabetic moderate-severe CKD 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic Utility of Total Kidney Volume for Chronic Kidney Disease Risk Prediction: An Observational and Mendelian Randomization Study 93%
- HBA Copy Number and Kidney Disease Risk among Black Americans: a Longitudinal Cohort Study 93%
- The impact of competing risks in kidney allograft failure prediction 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.