Diagnosing and remediating harmful data shifts for the responsible deployment of clinical AI models
Subasri, V.; Krishnan, A.; Dhalla, A.; Pandya, D.; Malkin, D.; Razak, F.; Verma, A.; Goldenberg, A.; Dolatabadi, E.
Show abstract
Harmful data shifts occur when the distribution of data used to train a clinical AI system differs significantly from the distribution of data encountered during deployment, leading to erroneous predictions and potential harm to patients. We evaluated the impact of data shifts on an early warning system for in-hospital mortality that uses electronic health record data from patients admitted to a general internal medicine service, across 7 large hospitals in Toronto, Canada. We found model performance to differ across subgroups of clinical diagnoses, sex and age. To explore the robustness of the model, we evaluated potentially harmful data shifts across demographics, hospital types, seasons, time of hospital admission, and whether the patient was admitted from an acute care institution or nursing home, without relying on model performance. Interestingly, many of these harmful data shifts were unidirectional. We found models trained on community hospitals experience harmful data shifts when evaluated on academic hospitals, whereas models trained on academic hospitals transfer well to the community hospitals. To improve model performance across hospital sites we employed transfer learning, a strategy that stores knowledge gained from learning one domain and applies it to a different but related domain. We found hospital type-specific models that leverage transfer learning, perform better than models that use all available hospitals. Furthermore, we monitored data shifts over time and identified model deterioration during the COVID-19 pandemic. Typically, machine learning models remain locked after deployment, however, this can lead to model deterioration due to harmful data shifts that occur over time. We used continual learning, the process of learning from a continual stream of data in a sequential manner, to mitigate data shifts over time and improve model performance. Overall, our study is a crucial step towards the deployment of clinical AI models, by providing strategies and workflows to ensure the safety and efficacy of these models in real-world settings.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Pretrained Patient Trajectories for Adverse Drug Event Prediction Using Common Data Model-based Electronic Health Records 95%
- Subpopulation-specific Machine Learning Prognosis for Underrepresented Patients with Double Prioritized Bias Correction 94%
- LUNAR: A Deep Learning Model to Predict Glioma Recurrence Using Integrated Genomic and Clinical Data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Domain Generalization and Adaptation on Improving Model Robustness to Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine 95%
- EHR Foundation Models Improve Robustness in the Presence of Temporal Distribution Shift 95%
- Construction and optimization of multi-platform precision pathways for precision medicine 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.