Back

The complexity of micro- and nanoplastic research in the genus Daphnia - A systematic review of study variability and meta-analysis of immobilization rates

Brehm, J.; Ritschar, S.; Laforsch, C.; Mair, M. M.

2023-03-25 ecology
10.1101/2023.03.24.534107 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In recent years, the number of publications on nano-and microplastic particles (NMPs) effects on freshwater organisms has increased rapidly. Freshwater crustaceans of the genus Daphnia are widely used in ecotoxicological research as model organisms for assessing the impact of NMPs. However, the diversity of experimental designs in these studies makes conclusions about the general impact of NMPs on Daphnia challenging. To approach this, we systematically reviewed the literature on NMP effects on Daphnia and summarized the diversity of test organisms, experimental conditions, NMP properties and measured endpoints to identify gaps in our knowledge of NMP effects on Daphnia. We use a meta-analysis on mortality and immobilization rates extracted from the compiled literature to illustrate how NMP properties and study parameters can impact outcomes in toxicity bioassays. In addition, we investigate the extent to which the available data can be used to predict the toxicity of untested NMPs based on the extracted parameters. Based on our results, we argue that focusing on a more diverse set of NMP properties combined with a more detailed characterization of the particles in future studies will help to fill current research gaps, improve predictive models and allow the identification of NMP properties linked to toxicity. HighlightsO_LISystematic review of NMP effects on the model system Daphnia C_LIO_LIOrganismic, experimental and NMP properties influence observed effects C_LIO_LIIn silico identification of traits likely linked to NMP toxicity (immobilization) C_LIO_LIMore detailed standardized characterization of NMP needed to improve predictions C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.