Back

Uropathogenic Escherichia coli population structure and antimicrobial susceptibility in Norfolk, UK

Carter, C.; Hutchison, A.; Rudder, S.; Trotter, E.; Waters, E.; Elumogo, N.; Langridge, G.

2023-03-24 microbiology
10.1101/2023.03.24.533965 bioRxiv
Show abstract

SynopsisO_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSHalf of all women have experienced a urinary tract infection (UTI) in their lifetime and this remains a persistent issue in rural counties like Norfolk, UK. In alignment globally, Uropathogenic E. coli (UPEC) are the main etiological agent for UTIs in Norfolk and are increasingly difficult to treat due to multi-drug resistance (MDR). ObjectiveWe set out to identify which clonal groups and resistance genes are disseminating in the community and hospitals in Norfolk, the first study of its kind for UPEC in this region. MethodsWe collected 217 clinical E. coli isolates causing UTIs in the community and hospital from the Clinical Microbiology laboratory at Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital. These were whole genome sequenced using the Illumina and MinION platforms for in silico multi-locus sequence typing and antibiotic resistance determinant detection. ResultsThe isolates were composed of 74 sequence types (STs); 8 lineages represented 57% of this population: ST73, ST12, ST69, ST131, ST404, ST95, ST127, and ST1193. Importantly, primary UTI screening deemed 8% of isolates to be MDR, with high rates of resistance to ampicillin (52.1%) and trimethoprim (36.2%) in hospitals. Of concern is the probable clonal expansion of MDR groups ST131 and ST1193 in hospitals and community settings with chromosomally encoded blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, and aac(6)-Ib-cr5. ConclusionsThe burden of reported UTIs in Norfolk is largely caused by non-MDR isolates. The UPEC population is continually evolving, and monitoring samples with consideration of sources will help reduce burden of disease.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.