The potential contribution of vaccination uptake to occupational differences in risk of SARS-CoV-2: Analysis of the ONS COVID-19 Infection Survey
Wilkinson, J. D.; Demou, E.; Cherrie, M.; Edge, R.; Gittins, M.; Katikireddi, S. V.; Kromydas, T.; Mueller, W.; Pearce, N.; van Tongeren, M.; Rhodes, S.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo assess variation in vaccination uptake across occupational groups as a potential explanation for variation in risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. DesignWe analysed data from the UK Office of National Statistics COVID-19 Infection Survey linked to vaccination data from the National Immunisation Management System in England from December 1st 2020 to 11th May 2022. We analysed vaccination uptake and SARS-CoV-2 infection risk by occupational group and assessed whether adjustment for vaccination reduced the variation in risk between occupational groups. Setting ResultsEstimated rates of triple-vaccination were high across all occupational groups (80% or above), but were lowest for food processing (80%), personal care (82%), hospitality (83%), manual occupations (84%), and retail (85%). High rates were observed for individuals working in health (95% for office-based, 92% for those in patient-facing roles) and education (91%) and office-based workers not included in other categories (90%). The impact of adjusting for vaccination when estimating relative risks of infection was generally modest (ratio of hazard ratios reduced from 1.38 to 1.32), but was consistent with the hypothesis that low vaccination rates contribute to elevated risk in some groups. Conversely, estimated relative risk for some occupational groups, such as people working in education, remained high despite high vaccine coverage. ConclusionsVariation in vaccination coverage might account for a modest proportion of occupational differences in infection risk. Vaccination rates were uniformly very high in this cohort, which may suggest that the participants are not representative of the general population. Accordingly, these results should be considered tentative pending the accumulation of additional evidence.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Differences in COVID-19 vaccination coverage by occupation in England: a national linked data study 96%
- Covid-19 Risk by work-related factors: Pooled analysis of individual linked data from 14 cohorts 95%
- Occupation and COVID-19 mortality in England: a national linked data study of 14.3 million adults 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population-level changes in the mental health of UK workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal study using Understanding Society 93%
- Do people reduce compliance with COVID-19 guidelines following vaccination? A longitudinal analysis of matched UK adults 93%
- Estimating the risk of post-COVID condition (PCC) in deprived communities, migrants and ethnic minorities in England: Findings from Virus Watch - a prospective community cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 mortality and excess mortality among working-age Californians, by occupational sector: March 2020 through November 2021 92%
- Community prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in England during April to September 2020: Results from the ONS Coronavirus Infection Survey 91%
- High seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among people living in precarious situations in Ile de France 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative effectiveness of different primary vaccination courses on mRNA based booster vaccines against SARs-COV-2 infections: A time-varying cohort analysis using trial emulation in the Virus Watch community cohort 92%
- Impacts of COVID-19 on sick leave 92%
- Cohort profile: Virus Watch: Understanding community incidence, symptom profiles, and transmission of COVID-19 in relation to population movement and behaviour 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk of death among teachers in England and Wales during the Covid19 pandemic 94%
- Acute and long-term impacts of COVID-19 on economic vulnerability: a population-based longitudinal study (COVIDENCE UK) 92%
- Geographical inequalities in the evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic: An ecological study of inequalities in mortality in the first wave and the effects of the first national lockdown in England 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.