Back

Computational Phenotypes for Patients with Opioid-Related Disorders Presenting to the Emergency Department

Gilson, A.; Schulz, W. L.; Lopez, K.; Young, P.; Pandya, S.; Coppi, A.; Chartash, D.; Fiellin, D.; D'Onofrio, G.; Taylor, R. A.

2023-03-29 emergency medicine
10.1101/2023.03.24.23287638 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveWe aimed to discover computationally-derived phenotypes of opioid-related patient presentations to the emergency department (ED) via clinical notes and structured electronic health record (EHR) data. MethodsThis was a retrospective study of ED visits from 2013-2020 across ten sites within a regional healthcare network. We derived phenotypes from visits for patients 18 years of age with at least one prior or current documentation of an opioid-related diagnosis. Natural language processing was used to extract clinical entities from notes, which were combined with structured data within the EHR to create a set of features. We performed Latent Dirichlet allocation to identify topics within these features. Groups of patient presentations with similar attributes were identified by cluster analysis. ResultsIn total 82,577 ED visits met inclusion criteria. The 30 topics discovered ranged from those related to substance use disorder, chronic conditions, mental health, and medical management. Clustering on these topics identified nine unique cohorts with one-year survivals ranging from 84.2-96.8%, rates of one-year ED returns from 9-34%, rates of one-year opioid event 10-17%, rates of medications for opioid use disorder from 17-43%, and a median Carlson comorbidity index of 2-8. Two cohorts of phenotypes were identified related to chronic substance use disorder, or acute overdose. ConclusionsOur results indicate distinct phenotypic clusters with varying patient-oriented outcomes which provide future targets better allocation of resources and therapeutics. This highlights the heterogeneity of the overall population, and the need to develop targeted interventions for each population.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.