Back

Does malignancy status effect outcomes in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke and cancer that underwent endovascular thrombectomy?

Shalabi, F.; Sacagiu, T.; Honig, A.; Molad, J.; Itsekson Hayosh, Z.; Hallevi, H.; Orion, D.; Aladdin, S.; Gomori, J. M.; Cohen, J. E.; Leker, R. R.

2023-03-29 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.03.23.23287554
Show abstract

BackgroundCancer is associated with an increased risk of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) including large vessel occlusions (LVO). Whether cancer status affects outcomes in patients with LVO that undergo endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) remains unknown. Methods and ResultsAll consecutive patients undergoing EVT for LVO were recruited into a prospective ongoing multi-center database and the data was retrospectively analyzed. Patients with active cancer were compared to patients with cancer in remission. Association of cancer status with 90-day functional outcome and mortality were calculated in multivariable analyses. We identified 154 patients with cancer and LVO that underwent EVT (mean age 74{+/-}11, 43% men, median NIHSS 15). Of the included patients, 70 (46%) had a remote history of cancer or cancer in remission and 84 (54%) had active disease. Outcome data at 90 days post-stroke was available for 138 patients (90%) and was classified as favorable in 53 (38%). Patients with active cancer were younger and more often smoked but did not significantly differ from those without malignancy in other risk factors, stroke severity, stroke subtype or procedural variables. Favorable outcome rates among patients with active cancer did not significantly differ compared to those seen in patients without active cancer but mortality rates were significantly higher among patients with active cancer on univariate and multivariable analyses. ConclusionsOur study suggests that EVT is safe and efficacious in patients with history of malignancy as well as in those with active cancer at the time of stroke onset although mortality rates are higher among patients with active cancer. Clinical PerspectivesO_ST_ABSWhat is new?C_ST_ABSO_LIThe results of the current study suggest that EVT is safe and efficacious in patients with history of malignancy as well as in those with active cancer at the time of stroke onset although mortality rates are significantly higher and favorable outcome rates tend to be lower among patients with active cancer. C_LI What are the clinical implications?O_LIThe results imply that all cancer patients with LVO stroke should be considered for EVT regardless of cancer status. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the American Heart Association
based on 92 papers
Top 0.4%
18.1%
2
Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
10.8%
3
Stroke
based on 29 papers
Top 0.8%
8.0%
4
Circulation
based on 37 papers
Top 2%
5.6%
5
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 66%
5.4%
6
Open Heart
based on 18 papers
Top 1%
5.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Atherosclerosis
based on 16 papers
Top 0.7%
4.8%
8
The American Journal of Cardiology
based on 15 papers
Top 2%
3.1%
9
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 29%
3.0%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 6%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 6%
2.6%
12
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
based on 33 papers
Top 4%
2.5%
13
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
based on 12 papers
Top 1%
1.9%
14
Heart
based on 10 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
15
International Journal of Cardiology
based on 13 papers
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
based on 30 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
17
European Heart Journal
based on 14 papers
Top 4%
1.4%
18
Journal of Neurology
based on 22 papers
Top 3%
1.4%
19
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
based on 10 papers
Top 1%
1.4%
20
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 6%
1.4%
21
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 14%
0.8%
22
Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
based on 12 papers
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
based on 11 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
25
Heart Rhythm
based on 16 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
26
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 18%
0.7%
27
Healthcare
based on 14 papers
Top 4%
0.7%