Back

MetaLLM: Residue-wise Metal ion Prediction UsingDeep Transformer Model

Shishir, F. S.; Sarker, B.; Rahman, F.; Shomaji, S.

2023-03-23 bioinformatics
10.1101/2023.03.20.533488 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Proteins bind to metals such as copper, zinc, magnesium, etc., serving various purposes such as importing, exporting, or transporting metal in other parts of the cell as ligands and maintaining stable protein structure to function properly. A metal binding site indicates the single amino acid position where a protein binds a metal ion. Manually identifying metal binding sites is expensive, laborious, and time-consuming. A tiny fraction of the millions of proteins in UniProtKB - the most comprehensive protein database - are annotated with metal binding sites, leaving many millions of proteins waiting for metal binding site annotation. Developing a computational pipeline is thus essential to keep pace with the growing number of proteins. A significant shortcoming of the existing computational methods is the consideration of the long-term dependency of the residues. Other weaknesses include low accuracy, absence of positional information, hand-engineered features, and a pre-determined set of residues and metal ions. In this paper, we propose MetaLLM, a metal binding site prediction technique, by leveraging the recent progress in self-supervised attention-based (e.g. Transformer) large language models (LLMs) and a considerable amount of protein sequences publicly available. LLMs are capable of modelling long residual dependency in a sequence. The proposed MetaLLM uses a transformer pre-trained on an extensive database of protein sequences and later fine-tuned on metal-binding proteins for multi-label metal ions prediction. A 10-fold cross-validation shows more than 90% precision for the most prevalent metal ions.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.