Back

An analysis of NHS 111 demand for primary care services

Pilbery, R.; Smith, M.; Green, J.; Chalk, D.

2023-03-21 primary care research
10.1101/2023.03.20.23287449 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe NHS 111 service triages over 16,650,745 calls per year and approximately 48% of callers are triaged to a primary care disposition, such as a telephone appointment with a general practitioner (GP). However, there has been little assessment of the ability of primary care services to meet this demand. If a timely service cannot be provided to patients, it could result in patients calling 999 or attending emergency departments (ED) instead. This study aimed to explore the patient journey for callers who were triaged to a primary care disposition, and the ability of primary care services to meet this demand. MethodsWe obtained routine, retrospective data from the Connected Yorkshire research database, and identified all 111 calls between the 1st January 2021 and 31st December 2021 for callers registered with a GP in the Bradford or Airedale region of West Yorkshire, who were triaged to a primary care disposition. Subsequent healthcare system access (111, 999, primary and secondary care) in the 72 hours following the index 111 call was identified, and a descriptive analysis of the healthcare trajectory of patients was undertaken. ResultsThere were 56,102 index 111 calls, and a primary care service was the first interaction in 26,690/56,102 (47.6%) of cases, with 15,470/26,690 (58%) commenced within the specified triage time frame. Calls to 999 were higher in the cohort who had no prior contact with primary care (58% vs 42%) as were ED attendances (58.2% vs 41.8), although the proportion of avoidable ED attendances was similar (10.5% vs 11.8%). ConclusionLess than half of 111 callers triaged to a primary care disposition make contact with a primary care service, and even when they do, call triage time frames are frequently not met, suggesting that current primary care provision cannot meet the demand from 111.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 2%
10.0%
3
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.1%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.3%
5
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
7
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.3%
8
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.1%
9
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
10
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
11
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
The Lancet Infectious Diseases
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
13
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
14
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
15
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
16
JMIRx Med
31 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
18
BMJ Open Quality
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
19
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.9%
21
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
23
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
61 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%