Application of the ANDROMEDA Software for Prediction of the Human Pharmacokinetics of Modern Anticancer Drugs
Fagerholm, U.; Hellberg, S.; Alvarsson, J.; Spjuth, O.
Show abstract
The ANDROMEDA toolkit for prediction of human clinical pharmacokinetics, based on machine learning, conformal prediction and a new physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model, was used to predict and characterize the human clinical pharmacokinetics of 12 small anticancer drugs marketed in 2021 and 2022 (molecular weight 355 to 1326 g/mol). The study is part of a series of software validations. A majority of clinical pharmacokinetic data was missing. ANDROMEDA successfully filled this gap. Most drugs were predicted/measured to have relatively complex pharmacokinetics, with limited passive permeability+efflux, high degree of plasma protein binding, significant gut-wall elimination and food interaction, biliary excretion and/or limited dissolution potential. Median, mean and maximum prediction errors for steady state volume of distribution, unbound fraction in plasma, blood-to-plasma concentration ratio, hepatic, renal and total clearance, fraction absorbed, oral bioavailability, half-life and degree of food interaction were 1.6-, 2.4- and 17-fold, respectively. Less than 3-fold errors were found for 78 % of predictions. Results are consistent with those obtained in previous validation studies and are better than with the best laboratory-based prediction methods, which validates ANDROMEDA for predictions of human clinical pharmacokinetics of modern small anticancer drugs with multi-mechanistical and challenging pharmacokinetics.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- PBPK modelling of dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19 and liver disease 97%
- Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling of the role of CYP2D6 polymorphism for metabolic phenotyping with dextromethorphan 94%
- Pharmacokinetics of caffeine: A systematic analysis of reported data for application in metabolic phenotyping and liver function testing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improved bioavailability of montelukast through a novel oral mucoadhesive film in humans and mice 93%
- Interactions of anti-COVID-19 drug candidates with multispecific ABC and OATP drug transporters 91%
- Amorphous solid dispersions and the confounding effect of nanoparticles in in vitro dissolution and in vivo testing: Niclosamide as a case of study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- In silico PK predictions in Drug Discovery: Benchmarking of Strategies to Integrate Machine Learning with Empiric and Mechanistic PK modelling 95%
- Risk assessment of drug-induced Long QT Syndrome for some COVID-19 repurposed drugs 93%
- A Strategy to Treat COVID-19 Disease with Targeted Delivery of Inhalable Liposomal Hydroxychloroquine: A Non-clinical Pharmacokinetic Study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- DigiLoCS: A Leap Forward in Predictive Organ-on-Chip Simulations 95%
- Clinical safety and pharmacokinetics of a novel oral niclosamide formulation compared with marketed niclosamide chewing tablets in healthy volunteers: a three-part randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial 94%
- Tolerability and Pharmacokinetic Evaluation of Inhaled Dry Powder Hydroxychloroquine in Healthy Volunteers 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pharmacokinetic modelling to estimate intracellular favipiravir ribofuranosyl-5’-triphosphate exposure to support posology for SARS-CoV-2 92%
- Optimal dosing of cefotaxime and desacetylcefotaxime for critically ill paediatric patients. Can we use microsampling? 92%
- Optimal dose and safety of molnupiravir in patients with early SARS-CoV-2: a phase 1, dose-escalating, randomised controlled study 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.