Off-Label Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Among Inpatients with Atrial Fibrillation
Sandhu, A.; Kaltenbach, L. A.; Chiswell, K.; Shimoga, V.; Ashur, C.; Pribish, A.; Fonarow, G. C.; Piccini, J. P.; Ho, P. M.; Varosy, P.; Hess, P. L.
Show abstract
IntroductionAmong patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation (AF), the frequency of off-label direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dosing, associated factors, hospital-level variation, and temporal trends in contemporary clinical practice are unknown. MethodsUsing the Get With The Guidelines(R) Atrial Fibrillation (GWTG-AF) registry, patients admitted from January 1st, 2014 to March 31st, 2020, and discharged on DOAC therapy were stratified according to receipt of underdosing, overdosing, or recommended dosing. Factors associated with off-label dosing were identified using logistic regression. Hospital-level variation and temporal trends were assessed. ResultsOf 22,470 patients prescribed a DOAC at discharge from hospitalization for AF (66% apixaban, 29% rivaroxaban, 5% dabigatran), underdosing occurred among 2006 (8.9%), overdosing among 511 (2.3%), and recommended dosing among 19953 (88.8%). Patient-related factors associated with off-label DOAC use included age (underdosing: OR 1.06 per 1-year increase [95% CI 1.06-1.07] and overdosing: OR 1.07 per 1-year increase [1.06-1.09]), dialysis dependence (underdosing: OR 5.50 [3.76-8.05] and overdosing: OR 5.47 [2.74-10.88]), female sex (overdosing: OR 0.79 [0.63-0.99]) and weight (overdosing: OR 0.96 per 1-Kg increase [0.95-1.00]). Across hospitals, the adjusted median odds ratio for off-label DOAC use was 1.45 [95% CI 1.34-1.65] (underdosing: 1.52 [1.39-1.76] and overdosing: 1.32 [1.20-1.84]), indicating significant hospital-level variation. Hospital characteristics associated with underdosing included West vs. Northeast location (OR: 1.55 [1.04-2.31]), rural vs. urban setting (OR: 0.48 [0.28-0.83]), and number of beds (<200 vs. 500+, OR: 1.95 [1.29-2.95]). Recommended dosing significantly increased over time (81.9% in 2014 to 90.9% in 2020, p<0.0001 for trend) with a corresponding decline in underdosing (14.4% in 2014 to 6.6% in 2020, p<0.0001 for trend) and overdosing (3.8% in 2014 to 2.5% in 2020, p=0.001 for trend). ConclusionOne of 10 patients hospitalized for atrial fibrillation is discharged on off-label dosing of DOAC with significant variation across hospitals. While the proportion of patients receiving recommended dosing has significantly improved over time, opportunities to improve DOAC dosing persist.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Procedural Volume and Outcomes with Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: A Report from the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry 95%
- Differences in coagulation responses to vascular injury between uninterrupted dabigatran and apixaban - a clinical prospective randomized study 95%
- Early Experience with Ivabradine for Focal Atrial Tachycardia in Pediatric Patients with Congenital Heart Disease 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel: the Impact of Platelet Inhibition on Cerebrovascular Microembolic Events during TAVR 94%
- Direct Oral Anticoagulants Affect Activated Clotting Time During and Bleeding Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention 93%
- Cardiac and Perinatal Outcomes Among Pregnancies with Maternal Cardiac Arrhythmias 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anticoagulation trends in adults aged 65 and over with atrial fibrillation; a cohort study 95%
- OpenSAFELY: impact of national guidance on switching from warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in early phase of COVID-19 pandemic in England 94%
- Vascular Comorbidities Worsen Prognosis of Patients with Heart Failure Hospitalized with COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Effect of Medical Therapy on Reducing the Risk of Pacing Induced Cardiomyopathy 93%
- A claims-based score for the prediction of bleeding in a contemporary cohort of patients receiving oral anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism 93%
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.