Persons Diagnosed with COVID in England in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD): A Cohort Description
Andersen, K. M.; McGrath, L. J.; Reimbaeva, M.; Mendes, D.; Nguyen, J. L.; Rai, K. K.; Tritton, T.; Tsang, C.; Malhotra, D.; Yang, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo create case definitions for confirmed COVID diagnoses, COVID vaccination status, and three separate definitions of high risk of severe COVID, as well as to assess whether the implementation of these definitions in a cohort reflected the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of COVID epidemiology in England. DesignRetrospective cohort study SettingElectronic healthcare records from primary care (Clinical Practice Research Datalink, or CPRD) linked to secondary care data (Hospital Episode Statistics, or HES) data covering 24% of the population in England Participants2,271,072 persons aged 1 year and older diagnosed with COVID in CPRD Aurum between August 1, 2020 through January 31, 2022. Main Outcome MeasuresAge, sex, and regional distribution of COVID cases and COVID vaccine doses received prior to diagnosis were assessed separately for the cohorts of cases identified in primary care and those hospitalized for COVID (primary diagnosis code of ICD-10 U07.1 "COVID-19"). Smoking status, body mass index and Charlson Comorbidity Index were compared for the two cohorts, as well as for three separate definitions of high risk of severe disease used in the United Kingdom (NHS Highest Risk, PANORAMIC trial eligibility, UK Health Security Agency Clinical Risk prioritization for vaccination). ResultsCompared to national estimates, CPRD case estimates underrepresented older adults in both the primary care (age 65-84: 6% in CPRD vs 9% nationally) and hospitalized (31% vs 40%) cohorts, and overrepresented people living in regions with the highest median wealth areas of England (20% primary care and 20% hospital admitted cases in South East, vs 15% nationally). The majority of non-hospitalized cases and all hospitalized cases had not completed primary series vaccination. In primary care, persons meeting high risk definitions were older, more often smokers, overweight or obese, and had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index score. ConclusionsCPRD primary care data is a robust real-world data source and can be used for some COVID research questions, however limitations of the data availability should be carefully considered. Included in this publication are supplemental files for atotal of over 28,000 codes to define each of three definitions of high risk of severe disease. SUMMARY BOXESO_ST_ABSWhat is already known on this topic?C_ST_ABSO_LIThe UK Government publishes data on cases, hospital admissions and vaccinations related to COVID in England. C_LIO_LIThere are at least three definitions of persons at high-risk of severe COVID in use in England. C_LI What this study addsO_LIOur study created case definitions for COVID diagnoses, COVID vaccination, and three separate definitions of high risk of severe COVID for use in the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), a database covering 24% of England. C_LIO_LIThe COVID population in the CPRD has a different age and regional distribution than national case reports, which future studies may need to consider. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Early effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination with BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine and ChAdOx1 adenovirus vector vaccine on symptomatic disease, hospitalisations and mortality in older adults in England 95%
- Linked electronic health records for research on a nationwide cohort including over 54 million people in England 95%
- Characterizing the incidence of adverse events of special interest for COVID-19 vaccines across eight countries: a multinational network cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying markers of health-seeking behaviour and healthcare access in UK electronic health records 95%
- Development and validation of an algorithm to estimate the risk of severe complications of COVID-19 to prioritise vaccination 94%
- Public opinion on sharing data from UK health services for clinical and research purposes without explicit consent 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Medicines Intelligence Data Platform: A population-based data resource from New South Wales, Australia 94%
- Safety Monitoring of Bivalent COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines Among Recipients 6 months and Older in the United States 92%
- Using quantitative bias analysis to adjust for misclassification of COVID-19 outcomes: An applied example of inhaled corticosteroids and COVID-19 outcomes 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 infection after primary vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT1262b2 and after booster vaccination with BNT1262b2 or mRNA-1273: a population-based cohort study (COVIDENCE UK) 94%
- Migrants’ primary care utilisation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in England: An interrupted time series 93%
- Ethnic differences in SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hesitancy in United Kingdom healthcare workers: Results from the UK-REACH prospective nationwide cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An external validation of the QCovid risk prediction algorithm for risk of mortality from COVID-19 in adults: national validation cohort study in England 95%
- Understanding COVID-19 trajectories from a nationwide linked electronic health record cohort of 56 million people: phenotypes, severity, waves & vaccination 95%
- COVID-19 collateral: Indirect acute effects of the pandemic on physical and mental health in the UK 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.