The utility of ChatGPT for cancer treatment information
Chen, S.; Kann, B. H.; Foote, M. B.; Aerts, H. J.; Savova, G. K.; Mak, R. H.; Bitterman, D. S.
Show abstract
The use of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT for medical question-answering is becoming increasingly popular. However, there are concerns that these models may generate and amplify medical misinformation. Because cancer patients frequently seek to educate themselves through online resources, some individuals will likely use ChatGPT to obtain cancer treatment information. This study evaluated the performance and robustness of ChatGPT in providing breast, prostate, and lung cancer treatment recommendations that align with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. Four prompt templates were created to explore how differences in how the query is posed impacts response. ChatGPT output was scored by 3 oncologists and a 4th oncologist adjudicated in cases of disagreement. ChatGPT provided at least one NCCN-concordant recommendation for 102/104 (98%) prompts. However, 35/102 (34.3%) of these also included a recommendation that was at least partially non-concordant with NCCN guidelines. Responses varied based on prompt type. In conclusion, ChatGPT did not perform well at reliably and robustly providing cancer treatment recommendations. Patients and clinicians should be aware of the limitations of ChatGPT and similar technologies for self-education.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- ChatGPT in glioma patient adjuvant therapy decision making: ready to assume the role of a doctor in the tumour board? 90%
- Natural Language Word-Embeddings as a glimpse into healthcare at the End Of Life 90%
- User Testing of a Diagnostic Decision Support System with Machine-assisted Chart Review to Facilitate Clinical Genomic Diagnosis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated abstraction of clinical parameters of multiple myeloma from real-world clinical notes using large language models 93%
- A CDE-based data structure for radiotherapeutic decision-making in breast cancer 91%
- An Ontology-based Approach to Guide and Document Variable and Data Source Selection and Data Integration Process to Support Integrative Data Analysis in Cancer Outcomes Research 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automating Evaluation of LLM-generated Responses to Patient Questions about Rare Diseases 94%
- A Study of Calibration as a Measurement of Trustworthiness of Large Language Models in Biomedical Research 93%
- Natural Language Processing for Automated Annotation of Medication Mentions in Primary Care Visit Conversations 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.