Attitudes towards clinical and non-clinical services among individuals who self-harm or attempt suicide: A systematic review
Uddin, T.; Pitman, A.; Benson, G.; Kamal, Z.; Hawton, K.; Rowe, S. L.
Show abstract
The prevalence of self-harm has increased substantially in recent decades. Despite the development of guidelines for better management and prevention of self-harm, service users report that quality of care remains variable. A previous systematic review of research published to June 2006 documented largely negative experiences of clinical services among patients who self-harm. We reviewed research papers published since then until July 2022 to examine contemporary attitudes towards clinical and non-clinical services among individuals who self-harm and their relatives. We identified 29 studies meeting inclusion criteria, all of which were from high- or middle-income countries and were generally of high methodological quality. Our narrative synthesis identified negative attitudes towards clinical management and organisational barriers across services. Generally, more positive attitudes were found towards non-clinical services providing therapeutic contact, such as voluntary sector organisations and social services, than clinical services, such as emergency departments and inpatient units. Views suggested that negative experiences of service provision may perpetuate a cycle of self-harm. Our review suggests that in recent years there has been little improvement in experiences of services for patients who self-harm. These findings should be used to reform clinical guidelines and staff training across clinical services to promote patient-centred and compassionate care and deliver more effective, acceptable and accessible services.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A scoping review of trauma informed approaches in acute, crisis, emergency and residential mental health care 95%
- A qualitative meta-synthesis of service users’ and carers’ experiences of assessment and involuntary hospital admissions under mental health legislations: a five-year update 94%
- Current state of the evidence on community treatments for people with complex emotional needs: a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-harm during the early period of the COVID-19 Pandemic in England: comparative trend analysis of hospital presentations 94%
- Clinical Presentation of Psychotic Experiences in Patients with Common Mental Disorders Attending the UK Primary Care Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) Programme 94%
- The prevalence of probable mental health disorders among hospital healthcare workers during COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Subjective mental health and need for care among psychiatric outpatients during the COVID-19 pandemic: results from an outreach initiative in Sweden 91%
- Ethnic differences in receipt of psychological interventions in Early Intervention in Psychosis services in England: a cross-sectional study 91%
- Functional Disability, Health Care Access, and Mental Health in Ukrainians Displaced by the 2022 Russian Invasion 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A thematic analysis of Prevention of Future Death Reports for Children who died by suicide in England and Wales: January 2015 to November 2023 92%
- Ethnic inequalities in compulsory psychiatric hospital detentions during UK COVID-19 'lockdowns': A Regression Discontinuity Design in time study 91%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on health service utilisation following self-harm: a systematic review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Tracking the mental health of home-carers during the first COVID-19 national lockdown: evidence from a nationally representative UK survey 92%
- Approaches to improve mental health care for autistic children and young people: a systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
- Social relationships and depression during the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analysis of the COVID-19 social study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.