Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and risk of cardiovascular disease: A Mendelian Randomisation study in the UK Biobank
Tschiderer, L.; van der Schouw, Y. T.; Burgess, S.; Bloemenkamp, K.; Seekircher, L.; Willeit, P.; Onland-Moret, N. C.; Peters, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundObservational studies show that hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDPs) are related to unfavourable maternal cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profiles later in life. We investigated whether genetic liability to pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and gestational hypertension is associated with CVD risk factors and occurrence of CVD events. MethodsWe obtained genetic associations with HDPs from a genome-wide association study and used individual-participant-data of women and men from the UK Biobank to obtain genetic associations with CVD risk factors and CVD events (defined as myocardial infarction or stroke). The rationale for including men and nulligravidae was to study genetic liability to HDPs and CVD risk without experiencing the underlying phenotype. We applied Mendelian Randomisation analysis using inverse variance weighted regression in our primary analysis. ResultsWe included 264,160 women (mean age 56.4 [SD 8.0]) and 223,043 men (mean age 56.7 [8.2]) with available genetic data. Genetically proxied pre-eclampsia/eclampsia was related to higher risk of CVD with odds ratios of 1.20 (1.01, 1.43) and 1.29 (1.08, 1.53) in women and men, respectively. For genetically proxied gestational hypertension, odds ratios for CVD were 1.22 (1.10, 1.36) and 1.28 (1.16, 1.42) in women and men, respectively. Furthermore, genetically proxied HDPs were associated with higher levels of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and younger age at hypertension diagnosis in both women and men. ConclusionsGenetic liability to HDPs including pre-eclampsia/eclampsia and gestational hypertension is associated with higher CVD risk, implying biological mechanisms relating to these disorders are causally related to CVD risk in both women and men.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Leveraging genetic data to elucidate the relationship between Covid-19 and ischemic stroke 96%
- Blood pressure, cardiometabolic traits and cardiovascular events in women with uterine fibroids: a genetic correlation and Mendelian randomization study 96%
- Estimating the Population Benefits of Blood Pressure Lowering: A Wide-Angled Mendelian Randomization Study in UK Biobank 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Derivation of an Outcome-Driven Threshold for Aortic Pulse Wave Velocity: An Individual-Participant Meta-Analysis 95%
- Prediction of Preeclampsia from Clinical and Genetic Risk Factors in Early and Late Pregnancy Using Machine Learning and Polygenic Risk Scores 93%
- Increased TRPV4 channel expression enhances and impairs blood vessel function in hypertension 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic Hyperlipidemias and Coronary Artery Disease Risk 95%
- Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and impact of statin use in pregnant women with familial hypercholesterolemia 94%
- Insulin resistance potentiates the effect of remnant cholesterol on cardiovascular mortality in individuals without diabetes 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine Learning to Understand Genetic and Clinical Factors Associated with the Pulse Waveform Dicrotic Notch 94%
- Coronary Artery Disease Risk of Familial Hypercholesterolemia Genetic Variants Independent of Historical Cholesterol Exposure 94%
- A higher genetic risk for depression is a greater risk factor for cardiovascular disease in women 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of heavy menstrual bleeding with cardiovascular diseases in US female hospitalizations 93%
- The effect of maternal BMI, smoking and alcohol on congenital heart diseases: a Mendelian randomization study 93%
- Polygenic Risk Score Improves the Accuracy of a Clinical Risk Score for Coronary Artery Disease 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.