Back

High Resolution Salmonella Subtyping by the MLSTnext Method

Ma, Z.; Gharizadeh, B.; Huang, S.; Jia, M.; Wu, F.; Wang, C.

2023-03-11 microbiology
10.1101/2023.03.10.532158 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The food industry needs a straightforward, efficient, widely applicable and cost-efficient method to not only detect, but also determine serovar and potential sources of multiple strains in food and environment. While Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) can generate complete genomic profile of food pathogens, it is a laborious, time-consuming, and expensive method that necessitates pure isolates. As a result, it is unsuitable for samples with complex background, limiting its widespread application by food industry. However, traditional multilocus sequence typing (MLST) approaches do not provide sufficient single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) information to effectively track- and-trace sources of contamination. In contrast, ChapterDx MLSTnext-NGS (next-generation sequencing) Salmonella assay amplifies and sequences 47 polymorphic loci, evenly spanning the Salmonella enterica genome. As demonstrated in this study, the ChapterDx MLSTnext-NGS Salmonella can identify serovar with high resolution, distinguishing between various strains of the same serovar and resolve co-presence of different strains in a single sample. Additionally, this assay can analyze up to thousand samples in a single sequencing run within 22 hours, making it a highly efficient and scalable method for the food industry. Moreover, the cost per sample of the ChapterDx MLSTnext-NGS Salmonella assay is comparable to that of quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR), making it an affordable option. The assay uses ChapterDx amplification technology, allowing for the amplification of all 47 loci in a single-tube, single-step PCR reaction. This makes it one of the simplest NGS applications available. In summary, ChapterDx MLSTnext-NGS Salmonella assay can be implemented in many diagnostic laboratories to address increasingly complex food safety issues.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
International Journal of Food Microbiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
3
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
10.0%
4
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 19%
6.3%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 36%
3.9%
7
Journal of Virological Methods
36 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
8
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.1%
9
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
11
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
12
Talanta
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
13
Analytical Chemistry
205 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
14
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
16
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
19
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
20
Transboundary and Emerging Diseases
34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
21
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
23
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
24
Emerging Infectious Diseases
103 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
25
SLAS Technology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Analytica Chimica Acta
17 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
29
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
30
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%