Prediction of MCI-to-AD progression with atrophy-weighted standard uptake value ratios of 18F-Florbetapir PET
Fang, Y.-H.; Perucho, J. U.; Chiu, S.-C.; Lin, Y.-C.; McConathy, J.
Show abstract
Accurate prediction of MCI-to-AD progression is an important yet challenging task. We introduce a new quantitative parameter: the atrophy-weighted standard uptake value ratio (awSUVR), defined as the PET SUVR divided by the hippocampal volume measured with MR, and evaluate whether it may provide better prediction of the MCI-to-AD progression. Materials and Methods: We used ADNI data to evaluate the prediction performances of the awSUVR against SUVR. 571, 363 and 252 18-F-Florbetaipir scans were selected based on criteria of conversion at the third, fifth and seventh year after the PET scans, respectively. Corresponding MR scans were segmented with Freesurfer and applied on PET for SUVR and awSUVR computation. We also searched for the optimal combination of target and reference regions. In addition to evaluating the overall prediction performances, we also evaluated the prediction for APOE4 carriers and non-carriers. For the scans with false predictions, we used 18-F-Flortaucipir scans to investigate the potential source of error. Results: awSUVR provides more accurate prediction than the SUVR in all three progression criteria. The 5-year prediction accuracy/sensitivity/specificity is 90/81/93% for awSUVR and 86/81/88% for SUV. awSUVR also yields good 3- and 7-year prediction accuracy/sensitivity/specificity of 91/57/96 and 92/89/93, respectively. APOE4 carriers generally are slightly more difficult to predict for the progression. False negative prediction is found to either due to a near-cutoff mis-classification or potentially non-AD dementia pathology. False positive prediction is mainly due to the slightly delayed progression than the expected progression time. Conclusion: We demonstrated with ADNI data that 18-F-Florbetapir SUVR weighted with hippocampus volume may provide good prediction power with over 90% accuracy in MCI-to-AD progression.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison and aggregation of event sequences across ten cohorts to describe the consensus biomarker evolution in Alzheimer’s disease 96%
- Quantitative transport mapping of multi-delay arterial spin labeling MRI detects early blood perfusion alteration in Alzheimer’s disease 96%
- Assessment of the relationship between synaptic density and metabotropic glutamate receptors in early Alzheimer's disease: a multi-tracer PET study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Topographical overlapping of the Aβ and Tau pathologies in the Default mode networks predicts Alzheimer’s Disease with higher specificity 98%
- FMRI complexity correlates with tau-PET in Late-Onset and Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer's Disease 97%
- Disentangling the distal association between β-Amyloid and tau pathology at varying stages of tau deposition 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinct and joint effects of low and high levels of Aβ and tau deposition on cortical thickness 96%
- Preliminary Validation of a Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Metric for Tracking Dementia-Related Neurodegeneration and Future Decline 96%
- Medial temporal atrophy in preclinical dementia: visual and automated assessment during six year follow-up 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.