Pharmacodynamics, feasibility and safety of co-administering azithromycin, albendazole, and ivermectin during mass drug administration: a review

IntroductionTraditionally, health ministries implement mass drug administration programmes for each neglected tropical disease (NTD) as separate and distinct campaigns. Many NTDs have overlapping endemicity suggesting co-administration might improve programme reach and efficiency, helping accelerate progress towards 2030 targets. Safety data are required to support a recommendation to undertake co-administration. MethodologyWe aimed to compile and summarize existing data on co-administration of ivermectin, albendazole and azithromycin, including both data on pharmacokinetic interactions and data from previous experimental and observational studies conducted in NTD-endemic populations. We searched PubMed, Google Scholar, research and conference abstracts, gray literature, and national policy documents. We limited the publication language to English and used a search period from January 1st, 1995 through October 1st, 2022. Search terms were: azithromycin and ivermectin and albendazole, mass drug administration co-administration trials, integrated mass drug administration, mass drug administration safety, pharmacokinetic dynamics, and azithromycin and ivermectin and albendazole. We excluded papers if they did not include data on co-administration of azithromycin and both albendazole and ivermectin, or azithromycin with either albendazole or ivermectin alone. ResultsWe identified a total of 58 potentially relevant studies. Of these we identified 7 studies relevant to the research question and which met our inclusion criteria. Three papers analyzed pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions. No study found evidence of clinically significant drug-drug interactions likely to impact safety or efficacy. Two papers and a conference presentation reported data on the safety of combinations of at least two of the drugs. A field study in Mali suggested the rates of adverse events were similar with combined or separate administration, but was underpowered. A further field study in Papua New Guinea used all three drugs as part of a four-drug regimen also including diethylcarbamazine; in this setting, co-administration appeared safe but there were issues with the consistency in how adverse events were recorded. ConclusionThere are relatively limited data on the safety profile of co-administering ivermectin, albendazole and azithromycin as an integrated regimen for NTDs. Despite the limited amount of data, available evidence suggests that such a strategy is safe with an absence of clinically important drug-drug interactions, no serious adverse events reported and little evidence for an increase in mild adverse events. Integrated MDA may be a viable strategy for national NTD programmes. Plain English SummaryTreatment of the whole community (mass drug administration, MDA) has been a major intervention strategy against many neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) over the last decade. Normally health ministries deliver individual MDA rounds targeting specific NTDs. This multiplies the training, transport and time burden for local health service personnel in districts in which several NTDs are present, imposing considerable financial and human resource costs to health ministries and their partners, and causing requiring repeated disruption to the daily life of communities receiving MDA. Delivering MDA for several NTDs at one time could improve the efficiency of NTD programmes. We reviewed existing data on the safety and feasibility of combining MDA of albendazole, ivermectin and azithromycin into a single co-delivered MDA. Several studies had evaluated if taking these drugs at the same time changed drug levels in recipients blood; these studies concluded that there was not an important difference in blood drug levels comparing instances when the medicines were taken separately to instances when they were taken at the same time. Two non-randomised studies assessed side effects experienced by people taking combinations of the three drugs and suggested doing so was safe. One small study in Mali had assessed combining all three drugs and also suggested this was safe but was too small to give a definitive answer. Two studies in Papua New Guinea assessed all three drugs being taken together in combination with a fourth drug, diethylcarbamazine. These studies also suggest co-administration was safe overall. Most of the identified studies had some methodological shortcomings, such as small sample sizes or issues with the way adverse events were recorded. Overall, the data suggest co-administration of azithromycin, ivermectin and albendazole is viable, but larger safety studies are needed.