Back

Deciphering dermal fibroblast behavior in 3D bioprinted dermis contructs

chastagnier, L.; essayan, L.; courtial, e. j.; Marquette, C.; thomann, c.; PETIOT, E.; el-Kholti, N.

2023-03-07 bioengineering
10.1101/2023.03.07.531460 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In recent years, numerous strategies have emerged to answer the growing demand for graftable tissues. Tissue engineering and in-vitro production are one of them. Among all the engineered tissues, skin is one of the most advanced. Nevertheless, biofabrication of graftable and fully functional skin substitutes is still far from being reached. Skin reconstruction, particularly dermis, necessitates cultivation and maturation for several weeks (> 3 weeks) to recover the tissues composition and functions, which prevent its transfer to clinical applications. Thus, several strategies, including 3D bioprinting, have been explored to accelerate these productions. In the present study, based on the successful application of 3D bioprinting achieved by our group for skin reconstruction in 21 days, we propose to detail the biological behaviors and maturation phases occurring in the bioprinted skin construct thanks to a descriptive approach transferred from the bioprocess field. The aim is to comprehensively characterize dermis construct maturation phases (cell proliferation and ECM secretion) to master later the interdependent and consecutive mechanisms involved in in-vitro production. Thus, standardized quantitative techniques were deployed to describe 3D bioprinted dermis proliferation and maturation phases. Then, in a second step, various parameters potentially impacting the dermis reconstruction phases were evaluated to challenge our methodology and reveal the biological behavior described (fibroblast proliferation and migration, cell death, ECM remodeling with MMP secretion). The parameters studied concern the bioprinting practice including various printed geometries, bioink formulations and cellular physiology in relation with their nutritional supplementation with selected medium additives.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.8%
2
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.8%
3
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
4
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
5
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.1%
6
Advanced Functional Materials
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.7%
7
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
8
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
50% of probability mass above
9
Bioactive Materials
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.4%
12
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
13
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.6%
14
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
15
Bioengineering
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
16
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 12%
1.6%
18
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.6%
19
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
20
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
22
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
23
RSC Advances
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.2%
24
Cytotherapy
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Advanced Materials
53 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Advanced Biology
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
28
Advanced Materials Interfaces
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
30
Chemical Engineering Journal
10 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%