Leaf traits predict performance under varying levels of drought stress in cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)
Earley, A. M.; Nolting, K.; Burke, J. M.
Show abstract
Drought is a major agricultural challenge and is expected to worsen with climate change. Exploring plant traits and how they respond to drought has the potential to improve understanding of drought tolerance and inform breeding efforts to develop more drought tolerant plants. Given their importance in plant-water relations, we explored variation and plasticity in leaf traits in response to water limitation in cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). A set of four sunflower genotypes was grown under four different levels of water availability and leaf vein and stomatal traits were measured along with total biomass (as an indicator of performance), leaf mass per area (LMA), chlorophyll content, and various mass fraction traits related to resource allocation (e.g., leaf, root, and stem mass fraction). Traits exhibited numerous bivariate correlations within treatments that generally followed expectations based on the literature. For example, stomatal size and density were negatively correlated while stomatal density and vein length per area (VLA) were positively correlated. Most traits exhibited substantial plasticity, as evidenced by significant shifts in trait values across environments and multivariate analyses revealed differentiation in trait space across treatment levels. This included an overall reduction in growth/productivity in response to stress, accompanied by a shift in traits relating to gas exchange and hydraulics including stomatal and vein density (increased), stomatal size (decreased), and theoretical gsmax (increased). We found that variation in performance across treatments (estimated as total biomass) can be largely explained by a small number of putatively size-independent traits (i.e., VLA, stomatal length and density and LMA; R2 = 0.74). Moreover, on average, more extreme changes in VLA were associated with more extreme decreases in performance across environments. A small number of leaf traits can predict plant performance, with plasticity in VLA being the best predictor of changes in productivity.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Intrinsic water use efficiency depends on stomatal aperture rather than stomatal density in C3 and C4 grasses grown at glacial CO2 and low light 97%
- Modifying root/shoot ratios improves root water influxes in wheat under drought stress 96%
- Bulb growth potential is independent of leaf longevity for the spring ephemeral Erythronium americanum Ker-Gawl. 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Plasticity and the role of mass-scaling in allocation, morphology and anatomical trait responses to above and belowground resource limitation in cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) 97%
- Metabolomic, photoprotective, and photosynthetic acclimatory responses to post-flowering drought in sorghum 96%
- Between Two Extremes: Tripsacum dactyloides Root Anatomical Responses to Drought and Waterlogging 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anatomical drivers of stomatal conductance in sorghum lines with different leaf widths grown under different temperatures 97%
- Dissecting Succulence: Crassulacean Acid Metabolism and Hydraulic Capacitance are Independent Adaptations in Clusia Leaves 97%
- Leaf cell wall properties and stomatal density influence oxygen isotope enrichment of leaf water 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Altered cell wall hydroxycinnamate composition impacts leaf and canopy-level CO2-uptake and water-use in rice 97%
- Key traits and genes associate with salinity tolerance independent from vigor in cultivated sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) 96%
- The impact of stomatal kinetics on diurnal photosynthesis and water use efficiency under fluctuating light 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.