Back

Individual, organisational and system capacities, and the functioning of a multi-country implementation-focused network for maternal, newborn and child health: Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda.

Tesfa, A.; Nakidde, C.; Akter, K.; Khatun, F.; Mwandira, K.; Abreham, S. L.; Seruwagi, G.; Mwaba, K.; English, M.; Howell, C. D.; QCN Evaluation Group, ; Djellouli, N.; Colbourn, T.; Marchant, T.

2023-03-06 public and global health
10.1101/2023.03.04.23286667 medRxiv
Show abstract

Better policies, investments, and programs are needed to improve the integration and quality of maternal, newborn, and child health services. Previously, partnerships and collaborations that involved multiple countries with a unified aim have been observed to yield positive results. Since 2017, the WHO and partners have hosted the Quality of Care Network [QCN], a multi-country implementation network focused on improving maternal, neonatal, and child health care. In this paper we examine the functionality of QCN in different contexts. We focus on implementation capacities and contexts in four network countries: Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi, and Uganda. In each country, the study was conducted over several consecutive rounds between 2019-2022, employing 227 key informant interviews with major stakeholders and members of the network countries, and 42 facility observations. The collected data were coded using Nvivo-12 software and categorized thematically. The study showed that individual, organizational and system-level capacities, and circumstances all played an important role in shaping implementation success in network countries, but that these levels were inter-linked. Across all levels, systems that enabled leadership, motivated and trained staff, and created a positive culture of data use were critical - from the policy making arena including addressing financing issues - to the day-to-day practice improvement at the front line. Some characteristics of QCN actively supported these levels, for example shared learning forums for continuous learning, a focus on data and tracking progress, and emphasising the importance of coordinated efforts towards a common goal. However, inadequate system financing and capacity also hampered network functioning, especially in the face of external shocks.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.