A large-scale retrospective study in metastatic breast cancer patients using circulating tumor DNA and machine learning to predict treatment outcome and progression-free survival
Beddowes, E. J.; Ortega-Duran, M.; Karapanagiotis, S.; Martin, A.; Gao, M.; Masina, R.; Woitek, R.; Tanner, J.; Tippin, F.; Kane, J.; Lay, J.; Brouwer, A.; Sammut, S.-J.; Chin, S.-F.; Gale, D.; Tsui, D.; Dawson, S. J.; Rosenfeld, N.; Callari, M.; Rueda, O. M.; Caldas, C.
Show abstract
PurposeMonitoring levels of circulating tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) represents a non-invasive snapshot of tumor burden and potentially clonal evolution. Here we describe how a novel statistical model that uses serial ctDNA measurements from shallow whole genome sequencing (sWGS) in metastatic breast cancer patients produces a rapid and inexpensive assessment that is predictive of treatment response and progression-free survival. Patients and MethodsA cohort of 188 metastatic breast cancer patients had DNA extracted from serial plasma samples (total 1098, median=4, mean=5.87). Plasma DNA was assessed using sWGS and the tumor fraction in total cell free DNA estimated using ichorCNA. This approach was compared with ctDNA targeted sequencing and serial CA 15-3 measurements. The longitudinal ichorCNA values were used to develop a Bayesian learning model to predict subsequent treatment response. ResultsWe identified a transition point of 7% estimated tumor fraction to stratify patients into different categories of progression risk using ichorCNA estimates and a time-dependent Cox model, validated across different breast cancer subtypes and treatments, outperforming the alternative methods. We then developed a Bayesian learning model to predict subsequent treatment response with a sensitivity of 0.75 and a specificity of 0.66. ConclusionIn patients with metastatic breast cancer, sWGS of ctDNA and ichorCNA provide prognostic and predictive real-time valuable information on treatment response across subtypes and therapies. A prospective large-scale clinical trial to evaluate clinical benefit of early treatment changes based on ctDNA levels is now warranted.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrated radiogenomics models predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in high grade serous ovarian cancer 95%
- Angiogenic and Immune Predictors of Neoadjuvant Axitinib Response in Renal Cell Carcinoma with Venous Tumour Thrombus 95%
- RAB5A expression is a predictive biomarker for trastuzumab emtansine in breast cancer 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 97%
- The clinical and molecular significance associated with STING signaling in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer 94%
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-B DNA-Informed Mutation Burden as a Marker of Treatment Response and Outcome in Cancer 93%
- Sequential ATR and PARP Inhibition Overcomes Acquired DNA Damaging Agent Resistance in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma 92%
- Frequent post-treatment monitoring of colorectal cancer using individualized ctDNA validated by multi-regional molecular profiling 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Normalized LST is an efficient biomarker for homologous recombination deficiency and Olaparib response in ovarian carcinoma 95%
- Clinical activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK) inhibitors in patients with MAP2K1 (MEK1)-mutated metastatic cancers 92%
- Germline testing data validate inferences of mutational status for variants detected from tumor-only sequencing 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.