Back

Integrating extracellular vesicle and circulating cell-free DNA analysis on a single plasma aliquot from breast cancer patients improves the detection of HER2 positivity

Mugoni, V.; Ciani, Y.; Quaini, O.; Tomasini, S.; Notarangelo, M.; Vannuccini, F.; Marinelli, A.; Leonardi, E.; Pontalti, S.; Martinelli, A.; Rossetto, D.; Pesce, I.; Mansy, S. S.; Barbareschi, M.; Ferro, A.; Caffo, O.; Attard, G.; Di Vizio, D.; D'Agostino, V. G.; Nardella, C.; Demichelis, F.

2023-03-02 cancer biology
10.1101/2023.03.02.530645 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMulti-analyte liquid biopsies represents an emerging opportunity for non-invasive cancer assessment. We developed ONCE (ONe Aliquot for Circulating Elements), a novel multi-analytes liquid biopsy approach for the isolation of extracellular vesicles (EVs) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from a single aliquot of blood. MethodsWe assessed ONCE performance to classify HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer (BrCa) patients by combining RNA and DNA signals on n=64 healthy donors (HD) and non-metastatic BrCa patients. Specifically, we investigated EVs-derived RNA (EV-RNA) and cfDNA by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and by digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). Additionally, we utilized imaging flow cytometry to evaluate EVs as potential carriers of the HER2 protein. ResultsWestern blot analysis and immunocapture assay revealed that EVs-enriched proteins were detected at similar levels among the HER2+ and HER2- subtypes. Sequencing of cfDNA and EV-RNA from HER2- and HER2+ patients demonstrated concordance with in situ molecular analyses of matched tissues. Combined analysis of the two circulating analytes by ddPCR showed increased sensitivity in ERBB2/HER2 detection compared to single nucleic acid components. Multi-analyte liquid biopsy prediction performance was comparable to tissue-based sequencing results from TCGA. Also, we observed HER2 protein on the surface of EVs isolated from the HER2+ BrCa plasma, thus corroborating the potential relevance of studying EVs as companion analyte to cfDNA. ConclusionsThis data confirms the relevance of combining cfDNA and EV-RNA analytes for cancer assessment and supports the ONCE approach as a valuable tool for multi-analytes liquid biopsies clinical implementation.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.6%
2
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.9%
3
Laboratory Investigation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 16%
6.5%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
Breast Cancer Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
7
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
8
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.7%
9
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.4%
50% of probability mass above
10
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.1%
11
International Journal of Cancer
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
12
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
15
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
16
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
17
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
18
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
npj Breast Cancer
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
21
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
22
Clinical Chemistry
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
24
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 28%
0.8%
26
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
27
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
28
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
29
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
30
EBioMedicine
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%