Large-Scale Validation Study of an Improved Semi-Autonomous Urine Cytology Assessment Tool: AutoParis-X
Levy, J.; Chan, N.; Marotti, J.; Kerr, D.; Gutmann, E.; Glass, R.; Dodge, C.; Suriawinata, A.; Christensen, B.; Liu, X.; Vaickus, L.
Show abstract
Adopting a computational approach for the assessment of urine cytology specimens has the potential to improve the efficiency, accuracy and reliability of bladder cancer screening, which has heretofore relied on semi-subjective manual assessment methods. As rigorous, quantitative criteria and guidelines have been introduced for improving screening practices, e.g., The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS), algorithms to emulate semi-autonomous diagnostic decision-making have lagged behind, in part due to the complex and nuanced nature of urine cytology reporting. In this study, we report on a deep learning tool, AutoParis-X, which can facilitate rapid semi-autonomous examination of urine cytology specimens. Through a large-scale retrospective validation study, results indicate that AutoParis-X can accurately determine urothelial cell atypia and aggregate a wide-variety of cell and cluster-related information across a slide to yield an Atypia Burden Score (ABS) that correlates closely with overall specimen atypia, predictive of TPS diagnostic categories. Importantly, this approach accounts for challenges associated with assessment of overlapping cell cluster borders, which improved the ability to predict specimen atypia and accurately estimate the nuclear-to-cytoplasm (NC) ratio for cells in these clusters. We developed an interactive web application that is publicly available and open-source, which features a simple, easy-to-use display for examining urine cytology whole-slide images (WSI) and determining the atypia level of specific cells, flagging the most abnormal cells for pathologist review. The accuracy of AutoParis-X (and other semi-automated digital pathology systems) indicates that these technologies are approaching clinical readiness and necessitates full evaluation of these algorithms via head-to-head clinical trials.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial intelligence-driven morphology-based enrichment of malignant cells from body fluid 95%
- Clinical-Grade Validation of an Autofluorescence Virtual Staining System with Human Experts and a Deep Learning System for Prostate Cancer 94%
- Tissue contamination challenges the credibility of machine learning models in real world digital pathology 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A tool for federated training of segmentation models on whole slide images. 94%
- Development of an Interactive Web Dashboard to Facilitate the Reexamination of Pathology Reports for Instances of Underbilling of CPT Codes 93%
- Deep learning accurately quantifies plasma cell percentages on CD138-stained bone marrow samples 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Artificial intelligence-based histopathology image analysis identifies a novel subset of endometrial cancers with distinct genomic features and unfavourable outcome 94%
- The Impact of Digital Histopathology Batch Effect on Deep Learning Model Accuracy and Bias 94%
- ROSIE: AI generation of multiplex immunofluorescence staining from histopathology images 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of AI-based pre-screening of large bowel biopsies 94%
- Novel deep learning algorithm predicts the status of molecular pathways and key mutations in colorectal cancer from routine histology images 93%
- Multicenter Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Diagnosing Pediatric Patients with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.