Back

Forest cover is more important than its integrity or configuration of the landscape in determining the habitat use of mammals in a modified landscape in Colombia

Pardo, L. E.; Gomez-Valencia, B.; Deere, N.; Herrera Varon, Y.; Soto, C.; Noguera-Urbano, E. A.; Sanchez-Clavijo, L. M.; Romero, L.; Diaz-Pulido, A.; Ochoa-Quintero, J. M.

2023-02-28 ecology
10.1101/2023.02.27.530271 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human activities shape the structure of landscapes in different ways and hence modify animal communities depending on the type and intensity of these activities. The Montes de Maria subregion of Colombia has experienced a heavy transformation of most areas despite covering one of the last remnants of dry forest, a critically endangered ecosystem. However, the effects of this transformation have been little explored. Here, we used a multispecies occupancy model (MSOM) to understand the relative influence of three components of land-use change - deforestation (remaining habitat amount), degradation of habitat quality (habitat quality) and fragmentation (landscape configuration) on mammalian habitat use across a mosaic of tropical dry forest in Colombia. Our data suggest that the percentage of forest cover was substantially important for herbivores, and consistently showed a moderate effect on the entire community and some individual species. High variability in species-specific responses to the examined variables hindered broad taxonomic generalizations, nevertheless, we detected a moderate positive effect of forest cover in both diet specialists and generalists species, as well as in species with small home ranges. Although omnivores responses, tended to use less complex landscapes (mosaics of land uses), there was high uncertainty in this response. The lack of substantial effects on most species, and the absence of threatened species across this anthropogenic landscape, suggests that the current community is composed of species tolerant to habitat modifications, but not only diet generalist species. This is most likely the result of a long filtering process caused by land use transformation and hunting which could have caused non-sensitive species to distribute relatively homogenously across this landscape. Our results suggest that conservation strategies in the study area should focus on conserving and expanding as much forest as possible rather than only improving the quality of already existing forest patches.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.2%
2
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
3
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
4
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
5
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
6
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
8
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
50% of probability mass above
9
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
10
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
11
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
12
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
13
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
15
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
16
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
17
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
20
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
21
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
22
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
24
Ecological Entomology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
25
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
26
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
28
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%