Quantification of Subtype Purity in Luminal A Breast Cancer Predicts Clinical Characteristics and Survival
Kumar, N.; Gann, P. H.; McGregor, S.; Sethi, A.
Show abstract
PurposePAM50 profiling assigns each breast cancer to a single intrinsic subtype based on a bulk tissue sample. However, individual cancers may show evidence of admixture with an alternate subtype that could affect prognosis and treatment response. We developed a method to model subtype admixture using semi-supervised non-negative matrix factorization (ssNMF) of whole transcriptome data and associated it with tumor, molecular, and survival characteristics for Luminal A (LumA) samples. MethodsWe combined TCGA and METABRIC cohorts and obtained transcriptome, molecular, and clinical data, which yielded 11,379 gene transcripts in common, and 1,179 cases assigned to LumA. We used ssNMF to compute the subtype admixture proportions of the four major subtypes - pLumA, pLumB, pHER2 and pBasal - for each case and measured associations with tumor characteristics, molecular features, and survival. ResultsLuminal A cases with low pLumA transcriptomic proportion were likelier to have non-luminal pathology, higher clinical and genomic risk factors, and lower overall survival (log rank P < 10-5), independent of age, stage, and tumor size. We found positive associations between pHER2 and HER2-positivity by IHC or FISH; between pLumB and PR negativity; and between pBasal and younger age, node positivity, TP53 mutation, and EGFR expression. Predominant basal admixture, in contrast to predominant LumB or HER2 admixture, was not associated with shorter survival. ConclusionsBulk sampling for genomic analyses provides an opportunity to expose intratumor heterogeneity, as reflected by subtype admixture. Our results elucidate the striking extent of diversity among LumA cancers and suggest that determining the extent and type of admixture holds promise for refining individualized therapy. LumA cancers with a high degree of basal admixture appear to have distinct biological characterstics that warrant further study.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The prognostic value of lymph node involvement after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is different among breast cancer subtypes 95%
- Protein profiling of breast carcinomas reveals expression of immune-suppressive factors and signatures relevant to patient outcome 95%
- Hormone Receptor-status Prediction in Breast Cancer Using Gene Expression Profiles and Their Macroscopic Landscape 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A 20-feature radiomic signature of triple-negative breast cancer identifies patients at high risk of death 95%
- RNA Sequencing-Based Single Sample Predictors of Molecular Subtype and Risk of Recurrence for Clinical Assessment of Early-Stage Breast Cancer 95%
- Allelic expression imbalance of PIK3CA mutations is frequent in breast cancer and prognostically significant 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Prognostic value of the Residual Cancer Burden index according to breast cancer subtype: validation on a cohort of BC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 94%
- Clinical evaluation of BCL-2/X L levels pre- and post- HER2-targeted therapy 93%
- Targeted transcript quantification in single disseminated cancer cells after whole transcriptome amplification 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.