A Systematic Evaluation of Machine Learning-based Biomarkers for Major Depressive Disorder across Modalities
Winter, N. R.; Blanke, J.; Leenings, R.; Ernsting, J.; Fisch, L.; Sarink, K.; Barkhau, C.; Thiel, K.; Flinkenflügel, K.; Winter, A.; Goltermann, J.; Meinert, S.; Dohm, K.; Repple, J.; Gruber, M.; Leehr, E. J.; Opel, N.; Grotegerd, D.; Redlich, R.; Nitsch, R.; Bauer, J.; Heindel, W.; Gross, J.; Andlauer, T. F. M.; Forstner, A. J.; Nöthen, M. M.; Rietschel, M.; Hofmann, S. G.; Pfarr, J.-K.; Teutenberg, L.; Usemann, P.; Thomas-Odenthal, F.; Wroblewski, A.; Brosch, K.; Stein, F.; Jansen, A.; Jamalabadi, H.; Alexander, N.; Straube, B.; Nenadic, I.; Kircher, T.; Dannlowski, U.; Hahn, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundBiological psychiatry aims to understand mental disorders in terms of altered neurobiological pathways. However, for one of the most prevalent and disabling mental disorders, Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), patients only marginally differ from healthy individuals on the group-level. Whether Precision Psychiatry can solve this discrepancy and provide specific, reliable biomarkers remains unclear as current Machine Learning (ML) studies suffer from shortcomings pertaining to methods and data, which lead to substantial over-as well as underestimation of true model accuracy. MethodsAddressing these issues, we quantify classification accuracy on a single-subject level in N=1,801 patients with MDD and healthy controls employing an extensive multivariate approach across a comprehensive range of neuroimaging modalities in a well-curated cohort, including structural and functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Diffusion Tensor Imaging as well as a polygenic risk score for depression. FindingsTraining and testing a total of 2.4 million ML models, we find accuracies for diagnostic classification between 48.1% and 62.0%. Multimodal data integration of all neuroimaging modalities does not improve model performance. Similarly, training ML models on individuals stratified based on age, sex, or remission status does not lead to better classification. Even under simulated conditions of perfect reliability, performance does not substantially improve. Importantly, model error analysis identifies symptom severity as one potential target for MDD subgroup identification. InterpretationAlthough multivariate neuroimaging markers increase predictive power compared to univariate analyses, single-subject classification - even under conditions of extensive, best-practice Machine Learning optimization in a large, harmonized sample of patients diagnosed using state-of-the-art clinical assessments - does not reach clinically relevant performance. Based on this evidence, we sketch a course of action for Precision Psychiatry and future MDD biomarker research. FundingThe German Research Foundation, and the Interdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research of the University of Munster.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Applying Machine-Learning and Deep-Learning to Predict Depression from Brain MRI and Identify Depression-Related Brain Biology 96%
- Meta-analysis of Reward Processing in Major Depressive Disorder Reveals Distinct Abnormalities within the Reward Circuit 95%
- Predicting remission after internet-delivered psychotherapy in patients with depression using machine learning and multi-modal data 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict cognitive behavioral therapy outcome in obsessive-compulsive disorder using clinical and neuroimaging data 96%
- Individual Deviations from Normative Electroencephalographic Connectivity Predict Antidepressant Response 95%
- Estradiol Modulates Resting-State Connectivity in Perimenopausal Depression 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Neurocognitive measures of self-blame and risk prediction models of recurrence in major depressive disorder 95%
- Machine learning identifies large-scale reward-related activity modulated by dopaminergic enhancement in major depression 95%
- Maladaptive avoidance learning in the orbitofrontal cortex in adolescents with major depression 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting depression risk in early adolescence via multimodal brain imaging 94%
- Emotion regulation in emerging adults with major depressive disorder and frequent cannabis use 94%
- Disorder- and emotional context-specific neurofunctional alterations during inhibitory control in generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive Patterns of Antidepressant Response from Pre-Treatment Reward Processing using Functional MRI and Deep Learning: Key Results from the EMBARC Randomized Clinical Trial 96%
- Heterogeneity in Depression: evidence for distinct clinical and neurobiological profiles 95%
- Aberrant levels of cortical myelin distinguish individuals with unipolar depression from healthy controls 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.