Back

Idioblasts accumulating anticancer alkaloids in Catharanthus roseus leaves are a unique cell type

Guedes, J. G.; Ribeiro, R.; Carqueijeiro, I.; Guimaraes, A. L.; Bispo, C.; Archer, J.; Azevedo, H.; Fonseca, N. A.; Sottomayor, M.

2023-02-27 plant biology
10.1101/2023.02.24.529939 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Catharanthus roseus leaves produce a range of monoterpenoid indole alkaloids (MIAs) that include low levels of the anticancer drugs vinblastine and vincristine. The MIA pathway displays a complex architecture spanning different subcellular and cell-type localizations and is under complex regulation. As a result, the development of strategies to increase the levels of the anticancer MIAs has remained elusive. The pathway involves mesophyll specialised idioblasts where the late unsolved biosynthetic steps are thought to occur. Here, protoplasts of C. roseus leaf idioblasts were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, and their differential alkaloid and transcriptomic profiles were characterised. This involved the assembly of an improved C. roseus transcriptome from short- and long-read data, IDIO+. It was observed that C. roseus mesophyll idioblasts possess a distinctive transcriptomic profile associated with protection against biotic and abiotic stresses, and indicative that this cell type is a carbon sink, in contrast with surrounding mesophyll cells. Moreover, it is shown that idioblasts are a hotspot of alkaloid accumulation, suggesting that their transcriptome may hold the keys to the in-depth understanding of the MIA pathway and the success of strategies leading to higher levels of the anticancer drugs. HighlightCatharanthus mesophyll idioblasts are a hotspot of anticancer alkaloid accumulation. The idioblast transcriptome reveals commitment with stress responses and provides a roadmap towards the increase of anticancer alkaloid levels.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.