Back

Synthetic Cooling Agent in Oral Nicotine Pouch Products Marketed as "Flavor Ban Approved"

Jabba, S. V.; Erythropel, H. C.; Woodrow, J. G.; Anastas, P. T.; O'Malley, S.; Krishnan-sarin, S.; Zimmerman, J. B.; Jordt, S. E.

2023-02-24 pharmacology and toxicology
10.1101/2023.02.23.529797 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundUS sales of oral nicotine pouches (ONPs) have rapidly increased, with cool/mint-flavored ONPs the most popular. Restrictions on sales of flavored tobacco products have either been implemented or proposed by several US states and localities. Zyn, the most popular ONP brand, is marketing Zyn-"Chill" and Zyn-"Smooth" as "Flavor-Ban Approved", probably to evade flavor bans. At present it is unclear whether these ONPs are indeed free of flavor additives that can impart pleasant sensations such as cooling. MethodsSensory cooling and irritant activities of "Flavor-Ban Approved" ONPs, Zyn-"Chill" and "Smooth", along with "minty" varieties (Cool Mint, Peppermint, Spearmint, Menthol), were analyzed by Ca2+ microfluorimetry in HEK293 cells expressing the cold/menthol (TRPM8) or menthol/irritant receptor (TRPA1). Flavor chemical content of these ONPs was analyzed by GC/MS. ResultsZyn-"Chill" ONP extracts robustly activated TRPM8, with much higher efficacy (39-53%) than the mint-flavored ONPs. In contrast, mint-flavored ONP extracts elicited stronger TRPA1 irritant receptor responses than Zyn-"Chill" extracts. Chemical analysis demonstrated the presence of WS-3, an odorless synthetic cooling agent, in Zyn-"Chill" and several other mint-flavored Zyn-ONPs ConclusionsSynthetic cooling agents such as WS-3 found in Flavor-Ban Approved Zyn-"Chill" can provide a robust cooling sensation with reduced sensory irritancy, thereby increasing product appeal and use. The label "Flavor-Ban Approved" is misleading and may implicate health benefits. Regulators need to develop effective strategies for the control of odorless sensory additives used by the industry to bypass flavor bans.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nicotine & Tobacco Research
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.0%
2
Nicotine and Tobacco Research
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
50% of probability mass above
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.5%
4
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 5%
4.1%
5
Frontiers in Pharmacology
100 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.8%
6
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
7
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.8%
8
ACS Pharmacology & Translational Science
40 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
10
Chemosphere
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
11
Clinical and Translational Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
12
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
14 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
13
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
14
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
15
Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
16
Archives of Toxicology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
17
Toxicological Sciences
38 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
18
JAMA
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
19
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
20
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Thorax
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
23
Journal of Psychopharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
Frontiers in Psychiatry
83 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%