Back

Initial Experience with Intercostal Insertion of an Extravascular ICD Lead Compatible with Existing Pulse Generators

Burke, M. C.; Knops, R. E.; Reddy, V. Y. Y.; Aasbo, J. D.; Husby, M.; Marcovecchio, A.; O'Connor, M.; Sanghera, R.; Scheck, D.; Pepplinkhuizen, S.; Ebner, A.

2023-02-26 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2023.02.21.23286264
Show abstract

Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSObjectivesC_ST_ABSThis study assessed safety and feasibility of a novel extravascular (EV) implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead when inserted anteriorly through a rib space and connected to various commercially available ICD pulse generators (PGs) placed in either a left mid-axillary or left pectoral pocket. BackgroundCurrently available or investigational, EV-ICDs include a subcutaneous or subxiphoid lead connected to customized EV-ICD PGs. This novel EV-ICD (AtaCor Medical, Inc, San Clemente, CA) employs a unique intercostal implant technique and is designed to function with commercial DF-4 ICD PGs. MethodsIn this non-randomized, single-center, acute study, 36 de novo or replacement transvenous (TV) ICD patients enrolled to receive a concomitant EV-ICD lead inserted through an intercostal space along the left parasternal margin. EV-ICD leads were connected to DF-4 compatible ICD PGs positioned in either a left mid-axillary or pectoral pocket for acute sensing and defibrillation testing. Defibrillation testing started at 30 Joules (J) and stepped down in 10 J increments following conversion success and stepped up in 5 J increments following conversion failure. ResultsSuccessful acute defibrillation using [≤] 35 J was noted in 100% of left mid-axillary PG subjects (n=27, mean 16.3 {+/-} 8.6 J) and 83% of left pectoral PG subjects (n=6, mean 21.0 {+/-} 8.4 J). All evaluable episodes (n=93) were automatically sensed, detected, and shocked. No serious device-related intraoperative adverse events were observed. ConclusionsThis first-in-human study documented safe and reliable placement of a novel extravascular ICD lead with effective sensing and defibrillation of induced ventricular fibrillation using commercial DF-4 ICD pulse generators. Condensed AbstractThis study assessed feasibility of intercostal implantation of a novel extravascular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead designed to function with commercial DF-4 pulse generators (PGs). Lead placement was successful in 33 of 36 attempts (94%). Acute defibrillation with [≤]35 J was successful in 27 of 27 left mid-axillary PG subjects (100%) and 5 of 6 left pectoral PG subjects (83%). All evaluable episodes (n=93) were automatically detected. No serious device-related intraoperative adverse events were observed. This study demonstrates feasibility of a novel extravascular ICD lead with effective sensing and defibrillating of induced ventricular fibrillation using commercial DF-4 PGs.

Matching journals

1
Circulation
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 37 published papers
Top 0.2%
51× avg
2
Heart Rhythm
Elsevier BV · based on 16 published papers
Top 0.2%
99× avg
3
Journal of the American Heart Association
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 92 published papers
Top 3%
13× avg
4
Heart
BMJ · based on 10 published papers
#1
89× avg
5
The American Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 15 published papers
Top 0.4%
46× avg
6
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Frontiers Media SA · based on 33 published papers
Top 2%
15× avg
7
BMJ Open
BMJ · based on 553 published papers
Top 31%
2.8%
8
PLOS ONE
Public Library of Science (PLoS) · based on 1737 published papers
Top 80%
2.8%
9
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 30 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
10
International Journal of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 13 published papers
Top 2%
24× avg
11
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 11 published papers
Top 1%
24× avg
12
Open Heart
BMJ · based on 18 published papers
Top 3%
12× avg
13
Scientific Reports
Springer Science and Business Media LLC · based on 701 published papers
Top 69%
1.8%
14
European Heart Journal - Digital Health
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 15 published papers
Top 2%
11× avg
15
Journal of the American College of Cardiology
Elsevier BV · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
16× avg
16
European Heart Journal
Oxford University Press (OUP) · based on 14 published papers
Top 4%
8.0× avg
17
Frontiers in Physiology
Frontiers Media SA · based on 18 published papers
Top 2%
10× avg
18
Circulation: Heart Failure
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) · based on 11 published papers
Top 2%
9.2× avg