Repurposing Chlorpromazine as add-on in the adjuvant phase of first-line glioblastoma therapeutic protocol in patients carrying hypo-/un-methylated MGMT gene promoter: RACTAC, a Phase II multicenter single arm clinical trial
Pace, A.; Lombardi, G.; Villani, V.; Benincasa, D.; Abbruzzese, C.; Cestonaro, I.; Corra, M.; Cerretti, G.; Caccese, M.; Silvani, A.; Gaviani, P.; Giannarelli, D.; Paggi, M. G.
Show abstract
BackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) is a devastating brain tumor with poor prognosis, characterized by rapid growth and invasion into surrounding brain tissue. It is a hard-to-treat cancer and represents an unmet medical need. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in developing novel approaches to improve the outcomes of GBM patients; among these, drug repurposing. Our preclinical studies identified the antipsychotic chlorpromazine (CPZ) as an important modulator of signal transduction and energy metabolism in GBM cells, so we embarked on a Phase II clinical trial in which CPZ has been added to the standard disease treatment. MethodsWith these assumptions, we started a multicenter phase II clinical trial on newly diagnosed GBM patients carrying hypo-/un-methylated MGMT gene promoter by adding CPZ to temozolomide (TMZ) in the adjuvant phase of the standard first-line therapeutic protocol RACTAC schedule). Primary endpoints: Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Combination treatment toxicity. Secondary endpoints: Overall Survival (OS) and Quality of Life (QoL) ResultsThe RACTAC schedule showed an overall clinical benefit in GBM patients carrying hypo-/un-methylated MGMT gene promoter. When compared with historical cohorts, these patients displayed longer PFS, with toxicity described as a dose-dependent sedation and liver toxicity, both expected. One case of severe liver toxicity has been reported. OS and QoL are still under evaluation. ConclusionsThis clinical trial confirms the anticancer properties of CPZ, as described in several preclinical studies. In addition, the RACTAC study can be considered at least as a proof-of-concept in demonstrating the effectiveness of interfering with the well-described oncogenic monoamine signaling between neurons and GBM.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Meta-Analysis of Adenoviral p53 Gene Therapy Clinical Trials in Recurrent Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma 92%
- Novel kinome profiling technology reveals drug treatment is patient and 2D/3D model dependent in GBM 92%
- Assessment of Prognostic Value of Cystic Features in Glioblastoma Relative to Sex and Treatment with Standard-of-Care 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 and topoisomerase I activities as predictive indicators for Glioblastoma susceptibility to genotoxic agents 93%
- Profiling anti-apoptotic protein BCL-xL expression in U-87 MG glioblastoma cells and patient-derived tumorspheres 93%
- LNX1 Modulates Notch1 Signaling to Promote Expansion of the Glioma Stem Cell Population During Temozolomide Therapy in Glioblastoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Phase 1b dose expansion and translational analyses of olaparib in combination with the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib in recurrent endometrial, triple negative breast, and ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer 91%
- Combination Therapies Targeting Alk-Aberrant Neuroblastoma In Preclinical Models. 90%
- Preclinical modeling of surgery and steroid therapy for glioblastoma reveals changes in immunophenotype that are associated with tumor growth and outcome 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- ClonoScreen3D: a novel three-dimensional clonogenic screening platform for identification of radiosensitizers for glioblastoma 90%
- Improving SBRT by re-wiring immunosuppressive neutrophils in murine pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 90%
- MET Inhibitor Capmatinib Radiosensitizes MET Exon 14-Mutated and MET-Amplified Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.