Back

Distinct genomic contexts predict gene presence-absence variation in different pathotypes of a fungal plant pathogen

Joubert, P. M.; Krasileva, K. V.

2023-02-17 genomics
10.1101/2023.02.17.529015 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundFungi use the accessory segments of their pan-genomes to adapt to their environments. While gene presence-absence variation (PAV) contributes to shaping these accessory gene reservoirs, whether these events happen in specific genomic contexts remains unclear. Additionally, since pan-genome studies often group together all members of the same species, it is uncertain whether genomic or epigenomic features shaping pan-genome evolution are consistent across populations within the same species. Fungal plant pathogens are useful models for answering these questions because members of the same species often infect distinct hosts, and they frequently rely on gene PAV to adapt to these hosts. ResultsWe analyzed gene PAV in the rice and wheat blast fungus, Magnaporthe oryzae, and found that PAV of disease-causing effectors, antibiotic production, and non-self-recognition genes may drive the adaptation of the fungus to its environment. We then analyzed genomic and epigenomic features and data from available datasets for patterns that might help explain these PAV events. We observed that proximity to transposable elements (TEs), gene GC content, gene length, expression level in the host, and histone H3K27me3 marks were different between PAV genes and conserved genes, among other features. We used these features to construct a random forest classifier that was able to predict whether a gene is likely to experience PAV with high precision (86.06%) and recall (92.88%) in rice-infecting M. oryzae. Finally, we found that PAV in wheat- and rice-infecting pathotypes of M. oryzae differed in their number and their genomic context. ConclusionsOur results suggest that genomic and epigenomic features of gene PAV can be used to better understand and even predict fungal pan-genome evolution. We also show that substantial intra-species variation can exist in these features.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
G3
33 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.3%
2
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
6.3%
3
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.2%
4
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
5
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
6
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
8
mBio
750 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.5%
9
Microbial Genomics
204 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
3.2%
10
Frontiers in Fungal Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
11
Environmental Microbiology
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
12
Journal of Fungi
31 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
13
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
14
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
15
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
16
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
17
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.9%
18
Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
19
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
20
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.9%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
23
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
24
PLOS Genetics
756 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
25
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
26
Molecular Biology and Evolution
488 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.9%
28
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
29
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
30
Molecular Plant Pathology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%