Back

The drivers of dark diversity in the Scandinavian tundra are metric-dependent

Hostens, L.; Van Meerbeek, K.; Wiegmans, D.; Larson, K.; Lenoir, J.; Clavel, J.; Wedegartner, R. E. M.; Piree, A.; Nijs, I.; Lembrechts, J. J.

2023-02-19 ecology
10.1101/2023.02.17.528269 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimDark diversity refers to the set of species that are not observed in an area but could potentially occur based on suitable local environmental conditions. In this paper, we applied both niche-based and co-occurrence-based methods to estimate the dark diversity of vascular plant species in the subarctic tundra. We then aimed to unravel the drivers explaining (1) why some locations were missing relatively more suitable species than others, and (2) why certain plant species were more often absent from suitable locations than others. LocationThe Scandinavian tundra around Abisko, northern Sweden. MethodsWe calculated the dark diversity in 107 plots spread out across four mountain trails using four different methods. Two niche-based (Beals index and hypergeometric method) and two co-occurrences-based (climatic niche model and climatic niche model followed by species-specific threshold) methods. This was then followed by multiple generalized linear mixed models and general linear models to determine which habitat characteristics and species traits contributed most to the dark diversity. ResultsThe study showed a notable divergence in the predicted drivers of dark diversity depending on the method used. Nevertheless, we can conclude that plot-level dark diversity was generally 18% higher in areas at low elevations and 30% and 10% higher in areas with a low species richness or low levels of habitat disturbance, respectively. ConclusionOur findings call for caution when interpreting statistical findings of dark diversity estimates. Even so, all analyses point towards an important role for natural processes such as competitive dominance as main driver of the spatial patterns found in dark diversity in the northern Scandes.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 13%
14.5%
2
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 25%
4.8%
5
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.3%
6
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.3%
7
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
8
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
50% of probability mass above
9
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
10
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
12
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
14
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
15
Ecological Indicators
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
16
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
17
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.5%
19
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
20
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
21
Hydrobiologia
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
22
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
23
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
24
Journal of Biogeography
37 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
26
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
27
Ecological Modelling
24 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
28
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
29
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%