"We had to put ourselves in their shoes": Experiences of Medical Students and ObGyn Residents with a Values Clarification Workshop on Abortion
Valley, T. M.; Cowley, E. S.; Farooque, A.; Shultz, Z. B.; Williams, M.; Askins, J.; Godecker, A.; Jacques, L.
Show abstract
PurposeValues clarification workshops on abortion have been shown to increase support for abortion among healthcare workers. However, few studies have examined the impact of values clarification workshops on abortion among medical trainees. This study aimed to understand medical student and obstetrics and gynecology (ObGyn) residents experiences with a virtual values clarification workshop on abortion. MethodsClerkship year medical students and ObGyn residents at four midwestern teaching hospitals were invited to be interviewed about their experiences in a virtual values clarification workshop on abortion from January 2021 through December 2021. A single interviewer conducted interviews via Zoom using a standardized interview guide. Participants were asked to provide feedback and discuss their experiences in the workshop. Four qualitatively trained evaluators coded the interview transcripts in NVivo, using an inductive approach to establish consensus codes then themes. ResultsThis study interviewed 37 trainees, including 24 medical students and 13 ObGyn residents, as well as five facilitators, between November 2021 and February 2022. Three themes emerged in both trainee groups. First, participants found the workshops helped trainees clarify and understand their own views on abortion through thought exploration, peer validation, and reflection on their views potential societal impacts. Second, through the workshop, participants reflected on others opinions on abortion and better understood the spectrum of beliefs their peers held. Finally, participants found the workshops helped them explore and develop their professional identity as physicians-in-training, through practicing communication skills and building trust and mutual respect among peers. ConclusionsMedical trainees found values clarification workshops on abortion to be valuable, helping them establish their own beliefs about abortion, contextualize these beliefs among their peers, and practice professionalism. These findings indicate that values clarification workshops can play a key role in helping medical trainees discuss abortion and prepare for their professional future. One in four people capable of pregnancy will have an abortion during their lifetime; abortions are one of the most common medical procedures in the United States1. Given this ubiquity, abortion education is recommended for medical students and required for Obstetrics and Gynecology (ObGyn) residents2-4. However, abortion education is increasingly sparse for both groups of trainees5,6. In addition, abortion is highly stigmatized and polarizing, including within healthcare7-9.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Translation, adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Abortion Attitude Scale - a secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study among medical students 93%
- Couple-Centered HIV Prevention and Care: Endorsement, Practice and Uncertainty among US Healthcare Providers in Western-Central Upstate New York 92%
- “We felt like part of a production system”: a qualitative study on women’s experience of mistreatment during childbirth in Switzerland 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Early medical abortion using telemedicine – acceptability to patients 95%
- Access and quality of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in Britain during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative interview study of patient experiences 94%
- Should COVID-specific arrangements for abortion continue? The views of women experiencing abortion in Britain during the pandemic 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 95%
- Evaluating the inclusion of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer-related content in graduate medical education: a national survey of program directors 93%
- COVIDReady2 Study Protocol: Cross-sectional Survey of Medical Student Volunteering and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United Kingdom 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trauma informed co-production: Collaborating and combining expertise to improve access to primary care with women with complex needs 92%
- A qualitative study investigating the acceptability of cervical screening and self-sampling in postnatal women at 6-week postnatal check-up 91%
- Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing among un- and under-screened Māori, Pasifika, and Asian women in Aotearoa New Zealand: a preference survey among responders and interviews with clinical-trial non-responders 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review 94%
- Caesarean birth in public maternities in Argentina: a formative research study on the views of obstetricians, midwives, and trainees 93%
- Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.