Back

Patients with fibrosis from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis have heterogeneous intrahepatic macrophages and therapeutic targets

Saldarriaga, O. A.; Krishnan, S.; Wanninger, T. G.; Oneka, M.; Rao, A.; Bao, D. Z.; Arroyave, E.; Gosnell, J.; Kueht, M.; Moghe, A.; Millian, D.; Jiao, J.; Sanchez, J.; Spratt, H.; Beretta, L.; Stevenson, H. L.

2023-02-23 pathology
10.1101/2023.02.16.23285924 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background and AimsIn clinical trials for reducing fibrosis in NASH patients, therapeutics that target macrophages have had variable results. We evaluated intrahepatic macrophages in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis to determine if fibrosis influenced phenotypes and expression of CCR2 and Galectin-3. Approach & ResultsWe used nCounter to analyze liver biopsies from well-matched patients with minimal (n=12) or advanced (n=12) fibrosis to determine which macrophage-related genes would be significantly different. Known therapy targets (e.g., CCR2 and Galectin-3) were significantly increased in patients with cirrhosis. However, several genes (e.g., CD68, CD16, and CD14) did not show significant differences, and CD163, a marker of pro-fibrotic macrophages was significantly decreased with cirrhosis. Next, we analyzed patients with minimal (n=6) or advanced fibrosis (n=5) using approaches that preserved hepatic architecture by multiplex-staining with anti-CD68, Mac387, CD163, CD14, and CD16. Spectral data were analyzed using deep learning/artificial intelligence to determine percentages and spatial relationships. This approach showed patients with advanced fibrosis had increased CD68+, CD16+, Mac387+, CD163+, and CD16+CD163+ populations. Interaction of CD68+ and Mac387+ populations was significantly increased in patients with cirrhosis and enrichment of these same phenotypes in individuals with minimal fibrosis correlated with poor outcomes. Evaluation of a final set of patients (n=4) also showed heterogenous expression of CD163, CCR2, Galectin-3, and Mac387, and significant differences were not dependent on fibrosis stage or NAFLD activity. ConclusionsApproaches that leave hepatic architecture intact, like multispectral imaging, may be paramount to developing effective treatments for NASH. In addition, understanding individual differences in patients may be required for optimal responses to macrophage-targeting therapies.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journal of Pathology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.7%
2
The American Journal of Pathology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Hepatology Communications
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.9%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 20%
5.6%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.9%
6
JCI Insight
277 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of Hepatology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
8
Hepatology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
9
Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
46 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
10
American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
11
Gastro Hep Advances
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
12
Genome Medicine
183 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.5%
14
Cells
249 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.4%
15
Gastroenterology
42 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
16
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
17
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 22%
1.3%
18
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 25%
1.1%
19
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 64%
1.1%
20
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
21
Physiological Genomics
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.9%
23
Molecular Therapy Methods & Clinical Development
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
24
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
25
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.9%
26
Matrix Biology Plus
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
27
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
28
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%