Back

Detection of obstructive sleep apnea from wearable physiological devices

Gavidia, M.; Montanari, A.; Goncalves, J.

2023-02-23 respiratory medicine
10.1101/2023.02.15.23285988 medRxiv
Show abstract

Apnea and hypopnea are common sleep disorders characterized by complete or partial obstructions of the airways, respectively. A sleep study, also known as polysomnography (PSG), is typically used to compute the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI), the number of times a person has apnea or certain types of hypopnea per hour of sleep. AHI is then used to diagnose the severity of the sleep disorder. Early detection and treatment of apnea can significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. However, continuous PSG monitoring is unfeasible as it is costly and uncomfortable for patients. To circumvent these issues, we propose a method, named DRIVEN, to estimate AHI at home from wearable devices and assist physicians in diagnosing the severity of apneas. DRIVEN also detects when apnea, hypopnea, periods of wakefulness occur throughout the night, facilitating easy inspection by physicians. Patients can wear a single sensor or a combination of sensors that can be easily measured at home: abdominal movement, thoracic movement, or pulse oximetry. For example, using only two sensors, DRIVEN correctly classifies 72.4% of all test patients into one of the four AHI classes, with 99.3% either correctly classified or placed one class away from the true one. This is a reasonable trade-off between the models performance and patients comfort. We use data from three sleep studies from the National Sleep Research Resource (NSRR), the largest public repository, consisting of 14,370 recordings. DRIVEN is based on a combination of deep convolutional neural networks and a light-gradient-boost machine for classification. Since DRIVEN is simple and computationally efficient, it can be implemented for automatic estimation of AHI in unsupervised long-term home monitoring systems, reducing costs to healthcare systems and improving patient care.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
22.5%
2
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.3%
3
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
6.8%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 28%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.8%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
8
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.6%
9
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
11
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
13
Sleep Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
14
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
15
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 36%
1.3%
16
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
17
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.9%
19
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
38 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
21
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
22
Sleep
26 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
SLEEP
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
24
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%
25
Nature Biomedical Engineering
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%