An economic evaluation of Wolbachia deployments for dengue control in Vietnam
Turner, H. C.; Quyen, D. L.; Dias, R.; Huong, P. T.; Simmons, C. P.; Anders, K. L.
Show abstract
BackgroundDengue is a major public health challenge and a growing problem due to climate change. The release of Aedes aegypti mosquitoes infected with the intracellular bacterium Wolbachia is a novel form of vector control against dengue. However, there remains a need to evaluate the benefits of such an intervention at a large scale. In this paper, we evaluate the potential economic impact and cost-effectiveness of scaled Wolbachia deployments as a form of dengue control in Vietnam - targeted at the highest burden urban areas. MethodsTen settings within Vietnam were identified as priority locations for potential future Wolbachia deployments (using a population replacement strategy). The effectiveness of Wolbachia deployments in reducing the incidence of symptomatic dengue cases was assumed to be 75%. We assumed that the intervention would maintain this effectiveness for at least 20 years (but tested this assumption in the sensitivity analysis). A cost-utility analysis and cost-benefit analysis were conducted. ResultsFrom the health sector perspective, the Wolbachia intervention was projected to cost US$420 per disability-adjusted life year (DALY) averted. From the societal perspective, the overall cost-effectiveness ratio was negative, i.e. the economic benefits outweighed the costs. These results are contingent on the long-term effectiveness of Wolbachia releases being sustained for 20 years. However, the intervention was still classed as cost-effective across the majority of the settings when assuming only 10 years of benefits. ConclusionOverall, we found that targeting high burden cities with Wolbachia deployments would be a cost-effective intervention in Vietnam and generate notable broader benefits besides health gains.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Model-based assessment of public health impact and cost-effectiveness of dengue vaccination following screening for prior exposure 95%
- A modelling assessment of short- and medium-term risks of programme interruptions for gambiense human African trypanosomiasis in the DRC 94%
- Towards the sustainable elimination of human African trypanosomiasis in Côte d’Ivoire using an integrated approach 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differentiating COVID-19 and dengue from other febrile illnesses in co-epidemics: Development and internal validation of COVIDENGUE scores 92%
- Epidemiological findings and estimates of the instantaneous reproduction number and control strategies of the first Mpox outbreak in Latin America 91%
- Costs of typhoid vaccination for international travelers from the United States 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Utility of surveillance data for planning for dengue elimination in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: a scenario tree modelling approach 97%
- Epidemiological impact and cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 vaccination in Kenya 94%
- Modelling the cost-effectiveness of essential and advanced critical care for COVID-19 patients in Kenya 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Community access to rectal artesunate for malaria (CARAMAL): a large-scale observational implementation study in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Nigeria and Uganda 93%
- Advancing Early Warning Systems for Malaria: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions - A Scoping Review 93%
- Yellow fever in Ghana: Predicting emergence and ecology from historical outbreaks 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The potential impact of Anopheles stephensi establishment on the transmission of Plasmodium falciparum in Ethiopia and prospective control measures 94%
- When time-dependence in disease outcome risk is not captured by impact evaluation modeling studies: a measles vaccination case study 93%
- Cost-effectiveness modelling to optimise active screening strategy for gambiense human African trypanosomiasis in the Democratic Republic of Congo 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.