Genotype and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Wolfram Syndrome and WFS1-related Disorders
Palaniappan, N.; Brown, C.; An, W.; Campbell, T.; Hurst, S.; Urano, F.; Hershey, T.; Lee, E.; Verma, M.; Pope, E.; Lee, S.; Blacher, L.; Neerumalla, P.; Marshall, B.; Lopez de Heredia, M.; Martinez, V.
Show abstract
ObjectiveWolfram syndrome (WFS) is an autosomal recessive disorder associated with juvenile-onset diabetes mellitus, optic atrophy, diabetes insipidus, and sensorineural hearing loss. We sought to elucidate the relationship between genotypic and phenotypic presentations of Wolfram syndrome which would assist clinicians in classifying the severity and prognosis of Wolfram syndrome more accurately. ApproachPatient data from the Washington University International Registry and Clinical Study for Wolfram Syndrome and patient case reports were analyzed to select for patients with two recessive mutations in the WFS1 gene. Mutations were classified as being either nonsense/frameshift variants or missense/in-frame insertion/deletion variants and statistical analysis was performed using unpaired and paired t-tests and one- and two-way ANOVA with Tukeys or Dunnetts tests. ResultsA greater number of genotype variants correlated with earlier onset and a more severe presentation of Wolfram syndrome. Secondly, non-sense and frameshift variants had more severe phenotypic presentations than missense variants, as evidenced by optic atrophy emerging significantly earlier in patients with 2 nonsense/frameshift alleles compared with 0 missense transmembrane variants. In addition, the number of transmembrane in-frame variants demonstrated a statistically significant dose-effect on age of onset of diabetes mellitus and optic atrophy. Summary / ConclusionsThe results contribute to our current understanding of the genotype-phenotype relationship of Wolfram syndrome, suggesting that alterations in coding sequences result in significant changes in the presentation and severity of Wolfram. The impact of these findings is significant, as the results will aid clinicians in predicting more accurate prognoses and pave the way for personalized treatments for Wolfram syndrome.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical, biochemical and molecular analysis in a cohort of individuals with gyrate atrophy 95%
- Utilization of CoRDS Registry to Monitor Quality of Life in Patients with VCP Multisystem Proteinopathy 92%
- Genetic Insight into Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome in Indian patients reveals novel mutations in FLCN 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Ophthalmic Manifestations of NAA10-Related and NAA15-Related Neurodevelopmental Syndrome: Analysis of Cortical Visual Impairment and Refractive Errors 95%
- Ocular Manifestations in a Cohort of 43 Patients with KBG Syndrome 93%
- Known pathogenic gene variants and new candidates detected in Sudden Unexpected Infant Death using Whole Genome Sequencing 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Advancing in Schaaf-Yang syndrome pathophysiology: from bedside to subcellular analyses of truncated MAGEL2 94%
- Cerebral Visual Impairment: genetic diagnoses and phenotypic associations 93%
- Clinical description, molecular delineation and genotype-phenotype correlation in 340 patients with KBG syndrome: Addition of 67 new patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Heterogeneous group of genetically determined auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders 93%
- Toward the pathogenicity of the SLC26A4 p.C565Y variant using a genetically driven mouse model 92%
- Molecular genetics of GLUT1DS Italian pediatric cohort: 10 novel related-disease variants and structural analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- New genes involved in Angelman syndrome-like: expanding the genetic spectrum 94%
- Differences in splicing defects between the grey and white matter in myotonic dystrophy type 1 92%
- Mutation analysis of multiple pilomatricomas in a patient with myotonic dystrophy type 1 suggests a DM1-associated hypermutation phenotype 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.