Indian COVID-19 Preprints Submissions in bioRxiv and medRxiv Preprint Servers
Raju, V.; Adakawa, M. I.; Harinarayana, N. S.; Yelemalla, C.
Show abstract
This research aimed at determining the growth of deposition of preprints on servers by Indian researchers during COVID-19 pandemic. In the pre-pandemic period, the dominant server was arXiv upon which research from physics and other related domains have been the most predominant depositors. When the pandemic erupted and the need to share research findings became imperative, many previously dormant preprint servers received vibrant activations from several scientists across the globe. This is with the intention of bridging the gap between delays inherent in reviewing process and the dire need to share information for finding everlasting solutions to the raging pandemic. Many researchers, institutions, countries, etc. have contributed in this regard. The study used quantitative method and iSearch Portfolio expert-curated source for publications and preprints related to either COVID-19 or the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 developed and maintained by National Institute of Health (NIH), US iSearch COVID-19 Portfolio. The study examined the Indian COVID-19 preprints deposited in bioRxiv and medRxiv preprint servers. The findings indicated that, Indian researchers have posted their papers in large numbers in bioRxiv and medRxiv servers with the medRxiv having the highest preprints (417, 40.44%) in 2020 against its counterpart bioRxiv (118, 10.96%) in the same year. Similarly, infectious diseases (except HIV/AIDS) (311) had the highest recurrence of the preprints submitted for deposition in servers. This is followed by epidemiology (263), public and global health (122), bioinformatics (59), among others. There is high collaboration among researchers who deposited their preprints in these servers where about 257 (24.93%) preprints were co-authored by 11+ authors followed by 3-authored and 4-authored with 124 preprints respectively (together accounts for 24.06%) and 2-authroed (114 (11.04%) preprints) respectively in a diminishing manner. The study concluded that, Indian researchers are actively participating in depositing preprints in servers notably bioRxiv and medRxiv.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Attitudes and Practices of Open Data, Preprinting, and Peer-review - a Cross Sectional Study on Croatian Scientists 94%
- Motivations, concerns and selection biases when posting preprints: a survey of bioRxiv authors 94%
- Mapping the coevolution, leadership and financing of research on viral vectors, RNAi, CRSPR/Cas9 and other genomic editing technologies 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enrichment analysis on regulatory subspaces: a novel direction for the superior description of cellular responses to SARS-CoV-2 91%
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 90%
- SARS-CoV-2 NSP14 governs mutational instability and assists in making new SARS-CoV-2 variants 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Experience from a COVID-19 screening centre of a tertiary care institution: A retrospective hospital-based study 91%
- Assessment of the knowledge, preferences and concern regarding the prospective COVID- 19 vaccine among adults residing in New Delhi, India-A cross sectional study 90%
- Serological prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibody among children and young age (between age 2-17 years) group in India: An interim result from a large multi-centric population-based seroepidemiological study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing protein-protein interaction networks of SARS-CoV-2 and (H1N1) influenza using topological features 92%
- Machine learning prediction of antiviral-HPV protein interactions for anti-HPV pharmacotherapy 92%
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.