The genetic spectrum of febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) and refractory status epilepticus
deCampo, D.; Xian, J.; Karlin, A.; Sullivan, K. R.; Ruggiero, S. M.; Galer, P.; Ramos, M.; Abend, N. S.; Gonzalez, A.; Helbig, I.
Show abstract
Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is a severe childhood epilepsy with refractory status epilepticus after a typically mild febrile infection. The etiology of FIRES is largely unknown, and outcomes in most individuals with FIRES are poor. Here, we reviewed the current state-of-the art genetic testing strategies in individuals with FIRES. We performed a systematic computational analysis to identify individuals with FIRES and characterize the clinical landscape using the Electronic Medical Records (EMR). Among 25 individuals with a confirmed FIRES diagnosis over the last decade, we performed a comprehensive review of genetic testing and other diagnostic testing. Management included use of steroids and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) in most individuals, followed by the ketogenic diet, and, after 2014, an increasing use of immunosuppressants, IVIG, and plasma exchange (PLEX). Genetic testing was performed on a clinical basis in almost all individuals and was non-diagnostic in all patients. We compared FIRES with both status epilepticus (SE) and refractory status epilepticus (RSE) as a broader comparison cohort and identified genetic causes in 36% of patients with RSE. In summary, despite the absence of any identifiable etiologies in FIRES, we performed an unbiased analysis of the clinical landscape, identifying a heterogeneous range of treatment strategies and characterized real-world clinical practice. FIRES remains one of the most enigmatic conditions in child neurology without any known etiologies to date despite significant efforts in the field, suggesting a clear need for further studies and novel diagnostic and treatment approaches. Furthermore, the difference in genetic signatures between FIRES and RSE suggest distinct underlying etiologies.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene panels for epilepsy suggest that previously defined variants of unknown significance may play an important role in epilepsy and certain variants may be pathogenic when occurring together 94%
- Frequency of and factors associated with antiseizure medication discontinuation discussions and decisions in patients with epilepsy: a multicenter retrospective chart review 93%
- New Insights into Epileptic Spasm Generation and Treatment from the TTX Animal Model 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-centre Epilepsy Lesion Detection (MELD) Project: Predictors of lesion location and postsurgical seizure freedom in focal cortical dysplasia 94%
- Penetrance of pathogenic epilepsy variants is low and shaped by common genetic background 93%
- A gain-of-function GRIA2 variant associated with neurodevelopmental delay and seizures: functional characterization and targeted treatment 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.