Characterizing the use of the ICD-10 Code for Long COVID in 3 US Healthcare Systems
Zhang, H. G.; Honerlaw, J. P.; Maripuri, M.; Samayamuthu, M. J.; Beaulieu-Jones, B. R.; Baig, H. S.; L'Yi, S.; Ho, Y.-L.; Morris, M.; Panickan, V. A.; Wang, X.; Hong, C.; Weber, G. M.; Liao, K. P.; Visweswaran, S.; Tan, B. W. Q.; Yuan, W.; Gehlenborg, N.; Muralidhar, S.; Ramoni, R. B.; The Consortium for Clinical Characterization of COVID-19 by EHR (4CE), ; Kohane, I. S.; Xia, Z.; Cho, K.; Cai, T.; Brat, G. A.
Show abstract
The International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10 code (U09.9) for post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) was introduced in October of 2021. As researchers seek to leverage this billing code for research purposes in large scale real-world studies of PASC, it is of utmost importance to understand the functional use of the code by healthcare providers and the clinical characteristics of patients who have been assigned this code. To this end, we operationalized clinical case definitions of PASC using World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control guidelines. We then chart reviewed 300 patients with COVID-19 from three participating healthcare systems of the 4CE Consortium who were assigned the U09.9 code. Chart review results showed the average positive predictive value (PPV) of the U09.9 code ranged from 40.2% to 65.4% depending on which definition of PASC was used in the evaluation. The PPV of the U09.9 code also fluctuated significantly between calendar time periods. We demonstrated the potential utility of textual data extracted from natural language processing techniques to more comprehensively capture symptoms associated with PASC from electronic health records data. Finally, we investigated the utilization of long COVID clinics in the cohort of patients. We observed that only an average of 24.0% of patients with the U09.9 code visited a long COVID clinic. Among patients who met the WHO PASC definition, only an average of 35.6% visited a long COVID clinic.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Application of Pharmacological Statin-Associated Muscle Symptoms Phenotyping Algorithms Using Structured and Unstructured Electronic Health Records Data 91%
- Enhancing Research Data Infrastructure to Address the Opioid Epidemic: The Opioid Overdose Network (02-Net) 91%
- Development of a COVID-19 Application Ontology for the ACT Network 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of a Derived International Patient Severity Algorithm to Support COVID-19 Analytics from Electronic Health Record Data 94%
- Development and implementation of a clinical decision support system tool for the evaluation of suspected monkeypox infection 94%
- Real-Time Electronic Health Record Mortality Prediction During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Prospective Cohort Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Distinguishing Admissions Specifically for COVID-19 from Incidental SARS-CoV-2 Admissions: A National Retrospective EHR Study 95%
- COHD-COVID: Columbia Open Health Data for COVID-19 Research 92%
- Characteristics and healthcare use of patients attending virtual walk-in clinics: a cross-sectional analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Finding Long-COVID: Temporal Topic Modeling of Electronic Health Records from the N3C and RECOVER Programs 91%
- Bridging the Literacy Gap for Surgical Consents: An AI-Human Expert Collaborative Approach 91%
- Predicting critical state after COVID-19 diagnosis: Model development using a large US electronic health record dataset 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.